English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have a theory that absolute zero (which has never been able to be reached despite alot of effort put into it) can be reached only in the absolute epi-center (ironic name in this case) of a black hole. We know that heat is made by particles moving, and hence why it is difficult to create absolute zero on earth, but what if there were a hyper gravitational drive such as a black hole to help negate movement of particles; IE packing in particles so tightly into such a small area that they are unable to move at all. With enough gravitational force wouldn't the particles shatter under the forces and create plates similar to what the earth has for layers or would it pack them in like packing peanuts and create an absolute zero environment?
-Dan

2006-11-25 11:54:40 · 7 answers · asked by skidmarks56 2 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

7 answers

It is impossible in principle to reach absolute zero. Temperatures of microkelvins have been achieved, but to actually reach absolute zero would require something colder to act as a heat sink, and of course that is impossible.

2006-11-25 11:57:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The center of a black hole is most likely super, super hot due to extreme gravitational forces upon all the particles within the event horizon.

I agree with the other responses about absolute zero.

2006-11-25 12:15:10 · answer #2 · answered by jonnyheroes 2 · 0 0

The singularity of a black hollow technically does not have a "midsection" because of the fact the singularity itself is a factor. it rather is infinitely small, and as a result has infinite density. the severe turbulence led to by making use of the gravity and mass of the singularity creates the "journey horizon", a sphere around the singularity. that's the factor of not return. If some thing is going in previous the progression horizon, even mild, it rather is going to be compressed into infinite density. A black hollow does not have infinite gravity, because of the fact infinite gravity might require inifnite mass, which a black hollow does not have. Mass from a black hollow is continually released as Hawking Radiation. So, at one factor, a marble would have greater mass and as a result gravity than a black hollow. so as to get an theory of the dimensions of the singularity, think of a pinhead. Now make it a hundred instances smaller. Now make it a hundred million instances smaller. try this a pair trillion instances greater. Now try this some octillion instances greater. you're a limiteless volume of instances greater desirable than the singularity of a black hollow. In different words, a singularity is the smallest length some thing would nicely be with out not latest.

2016-12-17 16:13:28 · answer #3 · answered by broscious 3 · 0 0

It is certainly true that the discussion on this issue is theoretical at best. One can assume that a black hole has a great gravitation pull that exceeds the speed of light. With such velocity, one might think that bodies pulled into the hole would dissipate with such heat. This is a very interesting subject.

2006-11-25 12:08:08 · answer #4 · answered by david42 5 · 0 0

I believe the Third Law of Thermodynamics forbids things from reaching absolute zero. I would thus assume nothing can reach it. You can't normally argue with a law and win.

2006-11-25 12:19:05 · answer #5 · answered by Edgar Greenberg 5 · 0 0

Absolute zero is an imaginary value. It cannot exist in the real universe, unless you want to extend yourself outside of this known universe.

2006-11-25 12:06:19 · answer #6 · answered by Doctor B 3 · 0 0

skidmarks56 Is this you? … :)!
http://www.osoq.com/funstuff/extra/extra01.asp?strName=skidmarks56

2006-11-25 12:17:43 · answer #7 · answered by mog p 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers