English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Astronomy & Space - August 2006

[Selected]: All categories Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

If you see the photo of sun, can you say whether it is rising or setting ?

2006-08-18 19:54:09 · 10 answers · asked by th_s 1

It's so awsome to look at. I was just wondering what it was

2006-08-18 19:17:11 · 5 answers · asked by Virginia 2

I'd love to go out and see countless shooting stars one night.

2006-08-18 19:15:43 · 5 answers · asked by Virginia 2

2006-08-18 18:30:55 · 16 answers · asked by nadim 1

2006-08-18 18:06:28 · 9 answers · asked by Roselle 1

why are all the planets and moons shaped like balls? is it to do with gravity?

2006-08-18 17:21:28 · 11 answers · asked by jjc3333 1

2006-08-18 17:12:33 · 13 answers · asked by Mr.Death 5

Leading astronomers of the world are
now trying to work out a more precise definition of a planet. By the end of August of this year (2006) they will have to either declare that one of our Solar System’s planets is not a planet or that there are about 20 planets in the Solar System. One thing is for sure: it will not be 9 planets anymore.
What do you think their decision will
be? More than 9 planets or less?

2006-08-18 16:45:35 · 12 answers · asked by dolempap 2

It would end up a bigger planet, more like the Earth. Good idea?

2006-08-18 16:19:41 · 6 answers · asked by fresh2 4

2006-08-18 15:14:21 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I feel so smothered by its atomsphere! I want to leave so badly.

2006-08-18 14:59:11 · 28 answers · asked by Bigger is Better 1

2006-08-18 14:56:52 · 10 answers · asked by Question Asker 1

Have you heard of "Nemesis," the star whose gravitationaly pull might be responsible for earth's periodic mass extinctions?

2006-08-18 14:55:10 · 9 answers · asked by mjs64ca 1

how to gain the ability to move objects with the mind

2006-08-18 13:19:45 · 15 answers · asked by ty v 1

2006-08-18 13:05:21 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

by the way i'm not refering to illegal aliens ;)

2006-08-18 12:48:11 · 15 answers · asked by SivGiger78 2

every site that offers monthly Ephemeris reports is for a specific location and time zone, so you get different results with different sites, HOW can i get the correct Ephemeris for MY specific location???

2006-08-18 12:41:29 · 5 answers · asked by Spaghetti H 1

I know he is very interested in this energy source, not much is known about it and I have made some amazing discoveries concerning this energy source. I know he would be interested in seeing my evidence and hearing about my discoveries. Can you let him know I would like to speak with him. You may give him my email address so he can contact me. Thank you.

2006-08-18 12:30:25 · 6 answers · asked by Cinderella 1

its important.. i dont know if i should scream or not...>_>

2006-08-18 12:00:18 · 9 answers · asked by elazrath 2

Like someone said at my school taht we get out of school the 22nd because all the stars or planets or what ever is lining up and with all the wars...is this true?

2006-08-18 12:00:04 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Mars Sphinx : http://www.planetarymysteries.com/egypt/sphinxmars.html

The most important recurring feature found in the mathematics of Cydonia is the value 0.865 -- derived from the ratio of e (an important mathematical constant equal to 2.7) and pi (the mathematical constant of 3.142 used to work out the properties of spheres and circles). This Hoagland terms the "message of Cydonia."

A trigonometrical function, the arc tangent of e/pi, gives the value of 40.8 which is the Mars latitude on which both the "D&M Pyramid" and the "NK Pyramid" are sited. Amazingly, another trigonometrical function, the cosine of e/pi, gives the value 30 -- the exact geographical latitude of the pyramids of Giza on Earth.

Hoagland has demonstrated that the Great Pyramid of Giza contains "tetrahedral" functions identical to those of the "D&M Pyramid" on Mars, and Torun has shown that the positioning of the Great Sphinx, relative to the pyramids, expresses the Cydonian ratio e/pi.

"The odds of such correlations happening by coincidence on two neighbouring planets are somewhere in the region of one in 7,000," says Hoagland. What makes coincidence look even less likely is a bizarre link to another ancient site on Earth.

One of the key angles of Cydonia, repeated again and again, is 19.5 degrees. this is precisely the latitude (19.5 degrees north) of the mysterious Mexican city of Teotihuacan, 'the place where men became gods', with its three distinctive pyramids dedicated respectively to the Sun, the Moon, and to Quetzalcoatl, the Central American counterpart of Osiris.

2006-08-18 11:10:23 · 4 answers · asked by The Patriot 4

Other folks are asking "Should we accept 3 new planets, or say goodbye to Pluto as a planet?" type questions. Thing is: this is entirely in the hands of the IAU (International Astronomical Union) so "we" have no say in the matter. So I'm asking a more relevant question: What if you DON'T accept the IAU's decison? What are you going to do about it?

2006-08-18 10:39:03 · 14 answers · asked by Search first before you ask it 7

2006-08-18 10:25:59 · 50 answers · asked by Anonymous

TV and movies are our modern mythology. I say Xena gets to be the official name.

All in favor say "Aye yi yi yi yi!"

2006-08-18 10:17:54 · 20 answers · asked by cailano 6

With a vote scheduled to decide the fate of Pluto set for August 24th, do you think we should accept the new definition that any round object orbitting the sun is a planet, or not. If not, then Pluto would be cut loose from our current solar system and we would only have 8 instead of 9. If you think we should accept the new definition, then we would go from 9 to 12. This includes a new planet that would find a spot in between Mars and Jupitor, one of Pluto's moons, and another called "Xena" beyond Pluto.

What are your thoughts, would you accept it?

2006-08-18 09:40:12 · 22 answers · asked by Davey 5

p=plank constant/wave length

plank constant = energy/frequency
wave length = c/frequency

p = energy/frequency/ c/frequency

p=energy/c

but energy=mc^2

so,
p = mc^2/c

p = mc.

According to this,

h/wavelength=mc

mass of a photon= hc/wavelength

IS THIS RIGHT ??????????

2006-08-18 08:51:51 · 6 answers · asked by suseendar 1

fedest.com, questions and answers