English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Mars Sphinx : http://www.planetarymysteries.com/egypt/sphinxmars.html

The most important recurring feature found in the mathematics of Cydonia is the value 0.865 -- derived from the ratio of e (an important mathematical constant equal to 2.7) and pi (the mathematical constant of 3.142 used to work out the properties of spheres and circles). This Hoagland terms the "message of Cydonia."

A trigonometrical function, the arc tangent of e/pi, gives the value of 40.8 which is the Mars latitude on which both the "D&M Pyramid" and the "NK Pyramid" are sited. Amazingly, another trigonometrical function, the cosine of e/pi, gives the value 30 -- the exact geographical latitude of the pyramids of Giza on Earth.

Hoagland has demonstrated that the Great Pyramid of Giza contains "tetrahedral" functions identical to those of the "D&M Pyramid" on Mars, and Torun has shown that the positioning of the Great Sphinx, relative to the pyramids, expresses the Cydonian ratio e/pi.

"The odds of such correlations happening by coincidence on two neighbouring planets are somewhere in the region of one in 7,000," says Hoagland. What makes coincidence look even less likely is a bizarre link to another ancient site on Earth.

One of the key angles of Cydonia, repeated again and again, is 19.5 degrees. this is precisely the latitude (19.5 degrees north) of the mysterious Mexican city of Teotihuacan, 'the place where men became gods', with its three distinctive pyramids dedicated respectively to the Sun, the Moon, and to Quetzalcoatl, the Central American counterpart of Osiris.

2006-08-18 11:10:23 · 4 answers · asked by The Patriot 4 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

4 answers

I always found this correlation fascinating. There is definately some kind of connection between Gizeh and Cydonia. Hoagland's calculations are not inaccurate as one of the answers states. The locations of monuments on Mars (and their dimensions) are different because they are representing the view of the celestial objects [they portray] from Mars' surface, as opposed to Gizeh's Earth perspective. The "face" is very similar to the Sphinx, this can't be coincidence. Also, the Bible speaks of the "King of the West". Who is, what the KJV Bible describes as a "foreign" god. The word foreign is used in place of "alien". This is some alien being that the Anti-Christ is supposed to be in league with. Alien/Satan?

Whatever explanation you believe, it's an interesting story regardless.

2006-08-19 15:07:32 · answer #1 · answered by brainzrgood4u 2 · 1 0

Hoagland is full of it and easily refuted by anyone with a single shred of common sense. The problem is he can spew so much garbage in just a few minutes that it's not worth the hours of effort it takes. But, hey, I don't need to waste my breath, as The Bad Astronomer (Hoagland's nemesis) has already done a pretty good job of refuting Hoagland's nonsense. (link given by kris above)

But here's the question for you...are you as open-minded when listening to professional astronomers who are critical of Hoagland?

2006-08-18 12:25:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

There is none. Use google earth and see that he is WAAY off on his calculations.
Funny how reality has a way of b itch slapping idiots like Hoagland and Bauval huh?
Oh and who calculates Pi to only three decimal places?

2006-08-18 16:25:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Hoagland is an idiot and doesn't know what he is talking about. Don't listen to anything he says.

For your reading pleasure:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/hoagland/

2006-08-18 11:45:19 · answer #4 · answered by kris 6 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers