Politics - 4 June 2007

The Republicans are through for at least ten yrs, if not forever.
(I was a Republican)

2007-06-04 14:44:16 · 17 answers · asked by Thomas Paine 5

Iraq has almost stopped 'rebuilding', and that what has been rebuilt could be destoyed at any time. The 'government' of 'Vichy Iraq' if anything is less competent than the Bush administration..if that's possible. While a real effort to deal with 'Terror Inc. wouldn't be a bad idea, continuing this BushWar for Oil ,or if you prefer this BushWar for Nothing has to end..and not in ten years. Wadda' 'ya think?

2007-06-04 14:42:03 · 5 answers · asked by Noah H 7

Is it jealousy of US democracy, wealth, freedom as Bush claimed?

To spread Islamic religion? (Is that their way to spread their religion? By Kamikaze's or terrorisms?)

Is it due to US years of continuous support on Israelis' regime occupation in the Middle East? (which unbearable depressions led ones, or the victims and the witnesses commit suicidal attack ?

All answers are appreciatiated, please tell me where you are from.

Thanks.

2007-06-04 14:40:48 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or is a scam for votes?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070605/ap_on_el_pr/democrats_religion

2007-06-04 14:36:37 · 2 answers · asked by ♥ liz ♥ 6

Hillary Clinton said that EVERY Republican at the Republican debates were for the war. THAT’S A LIE!!!!

Republican Rep. RON PAUL was AGAINST the war from the very beginning! Unlike Hillary, he didn’t believe the OBVIOUS BS propaganda coming from the White House. He even recently went on Bill Maher and stated that a big reason we are in the Middle East is to protect American OIL INTERISTS!!!! Are you EVER going to hear Hillary say such a blatant TRUTH like that??? Doubt it!!!

RON PAUL voted
AGAINST the war in Iraq,
AGAINST the National ID Card,
AGAINST the Military Commissions Act,
AGAINST the Patriot Act.

Hillary Clinton voted:
FOR the war in Iraq,
FOR the national ID card,
FOR the Military Commissions Act,
FOR the Patriot Act
.......

2007-06-04 14:32:38 · 31 answers · asked by ladykofnyc 3

I mean Fox News is rated #1 for a reason, there nightly programming is far superior than that of the LNN. just don't tune in just stick to the LNN, Ny Times, Boston Globe, and any George Soros anti-American hate media brand.

I mean come on guys the NY Times didn't even have the JFK terror plot on the front page on there Sunday edition, every NY Papper did, Post, Daily News, as a resident of NY I am disappointed in the times yet again.


O'Reilly calls Liberals out but also calls Cons out 2.
Hannity and Colmes the best News program on T.V.
Gretta is ok.

Please give good answers instead of Moveon.org said not 2 watch and hate Fox news.

2007-06-04 14:31:39 · 22 answers · asked by dez604 5

2007-06-04 14:30:14 · 12 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2

Secular may mean a state without religious influences, but I don't think the idea is to strip the religious rights of others. Typically most people that I meet that could be termed "secular" actively encourage a belief system. In fact, most of these people have never spoken a disdainful word about religion in my presence. The notion seems to be that the system would keep any one religion from gaining control over the rights and practices of other religions.

Now to the other term; "progressive". That doesn't sound all that awful to me. Progress is great! All too often we are promised progress without delivery.

I know some of you espouse a certain religion poised to take over our government, but for one moment try to think in the shoes of a minority faith before you answer.

2007-06-04 14:27:00 · 8 answers · asked by Dull Jon 6

2007-06-04 14:22:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

The United Nations just voted the chair of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development (specializing in economic land and rural development) to Zimbabwe (inflation 2,200%!) AND, if that wasn't bad enough, The UN Disarmament Commission chair to Syria with Vice Chair going to Iran.
And we are paying for this? Yes, other nations pay as well, but like the income tax here at home, it is "Means" adjusted, so the good ole USA pays the lions share.
Is it any wonder that people around the world think we are stupid? Paying for an organization that rewards the failures and penalizes the productive but, obviously, feeble minded?

2007-06-04 14:17:36 · 2 answers · asked by plezurgui 6

I._____________________
A. Crédit Mobilier
B. Teapot Dome
C. Watergate
D. Iran Contra Affair


1) Government Corruption

2) Civil Service Reforms

3) Disarmament Conferences

or

4)Foreign Policies

2007-06-04 14:11:59 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I find it so sad that conservatives have, since 2000, insulted the Americaness of individuals (Democrats) who disagree with the slightest thing. The party has really come off as bitter and hate filled.
Anyone have any good answers or thoughts?

2007-06-04 14:03:36 · 29 answers · asked by bdx22 3

We tell the brits to jump. ..... They say how high

We tell them to control the value of the euro- they say yes masta!

we tell them to send their troops to an illegal war that we started and brits say- sho thing masta. no problem


Isnt it great that at one time in this world the brits controlled us and now they are like our tool in europe.

Should we make laws that should be enforced in britian?

If they disagree with us should we attack them and make Britian our very own personal state?

2007-06-04 13:58:32 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

From Homosexuality to Pedophilia we are way too tolerant. If a female teacher would have slept with a 14 year old student 50 years ago there would have been hell to pay. Even if she was hot. Little Girls are taught to dress like prostitutes. It's sickening.

2007-06-04 13:46:50 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Democrats Are Trying to bring Back the Fairness Doctrine
to Control opposing views , from Fox and Conservative Talk
Radio.

2007-06-04 13:44:34 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Price of photo-op with Bush keeps dropping.“Gas prices may be up, but there’s something that’s apparently a little cheaper these days: A photo with President Bush.”

Bush headlined a fundraiser for the New Jersey state GOP, where donors could pay $5,000 to pose for a photo with the Commander in Chief. Expensive photo op, right? Well, that’s actually cheaper that what donors paid just a year ago for a grip and grin with Bush. Last summer, GOP officials around the country charged at least $10,000 a pop for presidential photo op, a bargain compared to the $25,000-a-flash Bush commanded during some Republican National Committee fund-raisers back in 2000 and 2004.”

How much would you pay?

2007-06-04 13:37:29 · 3 answers · asked by citizenjanecitizenjane2 4

2007-06-04 13:35:03 · 22 answers · asked by ibid 3

and even thou I dont agree with you on hardly anything I still love you and respect your right to speak your mind....
can you return the sentiment?????

2007-06-04 13:24:56 · 29 answers · asked by Unfrozen Caveman 6

2007-06-04 13:22:58 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-04 13:19:36 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why would so many countries be trying to reduce emissions? Why are so many countries upset that the US, and a couple of other major polluters, are doing so little about it.
Sources are pointless on this topic, it's kinda like religion, no logic is recognized in the 'debate'.

2007-06-04 13:16:38 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

These are volatile times, apparent and obvious, as indicated by questions and answers on this site as well as conversations in our homes and on our streets.

Can we all unite and answer this question, as Americans, and appreciate the love we all share of our country with thoughtful words? All respectful and introspective answers are greatly appreciated. Thank you.

2007-06-04 13:15:00 · 16 answers · asked by leslie 6

2007-06-04 13:13:08 · 10 answers · asked by WhyAreYouaREMF 3

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=189682

2007-06-04 13:09:42 · 5 answers · asked by Cherie 6

I've known many Christian families that have allowed their dying relatives to be taken off life support. Why did they expect President Bush to do something about her?

2007-06-04 13:08:00 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

win in '08?

What makes these people so Bizzare they don't accept that fiscally responsible republicans will not vote republican in '08?

2007-06-04 13:04:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

What does the latest revelations about William Jefferson say about the Democratic Party? How do I get 90 grand in my freezer?

2007-06-04 12:58:54 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

For all the free people that still protest, you're welcome. We protect you and you are protected by the best. Your voice is loud and strong, but who will fight for you? No one standing in your crowd. We are father's, brother's, and son's, wearing the boot's and carrying the gun's. We are the ones that leave all we own, to make sure your future is carved in stone. We are the ones who fight and die. We might not be able to save the whole world, well atleast we try. We walked the paths to were we are at, and we want no choice other then that. So when you rally your group to complain, take a look in the back of your brain. In order for that flag you love to fly, wars must be fought and young men must die. We came here to fight for the ones we hold dear, if that's not respected, we would rather stay here. So please stop yelling and put down your signs, and pray for those behind enemy lines. When the conflict is over and all is well, be thankful that we chose to go through hell.

2007-06-04 12:57:00 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Serious answers only. Love him? Hate him? Why?

Personally, I can't stand the man. I think he has an excuse for everything.

2007-06-04 12:54:27 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hear out these two big differences before answering:

1) You can lawfully not have car insurance if you don't drive. The only way you can lawfully not have health insurance is by committing suicide (which to me sounds counter to the point of requiring health insurance)

2) Mandatory car insurance is so that you can pay someone else if you damage their property. Mandatory health insurance only protects the individual from him or herself.

Can anyone reason with these dems before they throw this rights-squashing law on us?

2007-06-04 12:46:50 · 10 answers · asked by Dan 4