If it involves dogs, thumbscrews, submersion, or things of those nature then I am, by all means, opposed to it.
If it involves loud music (within reason), warmer or cooler rooms (again within reason), or things that are not truly torturous then, why not?
I have heard both arguments and I am inclined to believe that aspects of both are true.
It also seems like if they have to have secret CIA camps (which have been formally acknowledge by Bush) then the actions taking place at those locations cannot be very legitimate.
Does anyone have any knowledge of this subject, preferably with a reputable source that they can reference?
I apologize for the repost, but since Answers went down for awhile, I'm not sure that anyone actually saw this question. Here it is again.
2006-10-20
09:54:41
·
5 answers
·
asked by
I am all that is man
2