English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 18 September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

History of CIA's support of death squads.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6802629/site/newsweek/

The Pentagon may put Special-Forces-led assassination or kidnapping teams in Iraq

The information below is from CIABASE files on Death Squads supported by the CIA. Also given below are details on Watch Lists prepared by the CIA to facilitate the actions of Death Squads.

http://www.serendipity.li/cia/death_squads.htm
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/cia-a08.shtml
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6802629/site/newsweek/

When one former CIA operative candidly claimed that ‘Intelligence services are the heart and soul of a new country’ (Washington Post)), they were inadvertently expressing a position that Noam Chomsky might call ‘vulgar Marxist’.

2006-09-18 14:03:15 · 8 answers · asked by freetinka 1

My friend Matt really wants to know.

2006-09-18 13:57:32 · 40 answers · asked by ms_upsidedown 4

we havent been invaded by martians, but i dont hear bush taking credit for that....or that the US would be worse off with Gore or Kerry....

ever notice the right has nothing but empty threats and baseless accusations upon which they make their claims?

instead of making statements the right cant back up, instead..stfu until you have some facts

2006-09-18 13:56:10 · 14 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

Stop denying every truth the liberals say about Bush because you refuse to educate yourself. you only attempt to state that you support the war (which is not producing any results) or you insult Bill Clinton. why don't you WAKE UP already?! and see the negatives of Bush compared Clinton! the simple truth is that thanks to Clinton, the one responsible for the first attempt of the WTC bombings was caught and arrested.
Clinton led a very strong anti-terrorism campaign which he gets very little credit for.
Want to know the proven facts?:

the crime rate is higher now that Bush is in office.
more unemployed people now that Bush is in office.
freedom has been reduced now that Bush is in office.
America is less safe now that Bush is in office.
middle-class people are not as rich now that Bush is in office.
shall i continue?
Bush has cut off funds from many organizations and charities (too many to count) to finance these insane wars.

2006-09-18 13:49:43 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think "How sad"?

Do you think "Anyone in the middle east probably deserves to die"?

Do you think (like me) "How did America let this happen"?

2006-09-18 13:49:15 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

THEY STILL REMEMBER THAT IT'S A BLUE DRESS, TALK ABOUT EERIE!

2006-09-18 13:47:31 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

John Kerry says they hate it coz they dont want u questioning
them.

http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc_2006_04_22.html

What do u think?

2006-09-18 13:35:49 · 13 answers · asked by Ebee 1

2006-09-18 13:34:32 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Remember, our balance of trade with these nations despite the oil sales have historically been in the black. Bush of course has ruined all that.

Why can't some of you see that you are being brainwashed?

Saudi Arabia and Egypt have always had a simmering dislike of all things American, but we offer them more aid under this wicked administration.

2006-09-18 13:32:38 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

And what should be done to solve it?

2006-09-18 13:30:15 · 20 answers · asked by Miladi 3

.Just curious..of your observations.

2006-09-18 13:29:39 · 5 answers · asked by dstr 6

Examine:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AqhUTg1ctGWlZp4OJD30XNTsy6IX?qid=20060918154510AAGQ8WZ

Blacks are already favored by the government, colleges, and employers due to policies such as affirmative action and welfare. When are they going to realize that, no, we shouldn't pay their welfare because they spent their food money on Gucci shoes.

I don't see the Mexicans complaining about their plight when they are FAR more disadvantaged. I don't see the Japanese complaining about the internment camps from WWII still. They all work hard for their money. Mexicans, despite working two jobs, are often still poorer than blacks that were born in the U.S. I don't hear complaints from them about oppression, just immigration.

They just need to suck it up, work hard, stop buying rims, grills, etc., and stop glorifying drugs, murder, and gangstas. Don't ya think?

2006-09-18 13:23:10 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

americans. sorry it didnt fit the first time.

2006-09-18 13:21:40 · 22 answers · asked by diamonds_are_forever<3 3

If I had affiliates like those I would want to distance myself from them.

CONS are you going to take this opportunity to disown these hypocrites and Misogynists.?

2006-09-18 13:19:33 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

I wonder... They keep sayiong it was because he got a BJ -- but I keep reading over the articles of impeachment and it doesn't say anything at all about oral sex with anyone. What gives?

2006-09-18 13:03:19 · 19 answers · asked by Simon Templar 2

2006-09-18 12:59:45 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Well Bush wants to enforce Christianity in the region, why not start in friendly Saudi Arabia. You could collaborate with your friends the Bin Ladens.

2006-09-18 12:59:44 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

They got the russians scared

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/dprk/2006/dprk-060705-rianovosti07.htm

2006-09-18 12:55:59 · 12 answers · asked by Ebee 1

http://loosechange911.com

2006-09-18 12:53:55 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-18 12:47:42 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

They are such potent mixes that I wonder if the bible-thumping, fundamentalists of Birmingham, Alabama and such places should have access to the vote.

Even in a democracy like ours there should be checks and balances.

2006-09-18 12:45:31 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

1

2006-09-18 12:40:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Now all you hear from Democrats is how horrified they are at losing civil liberties, but it seems to me that a lot of those same people were curiously quiet when Clinton was using the Constitution for toilet paper and earning the reputation of having the "worst record on Civil Rights since Woodrow Wilson".

http://talkleft.com/new_archives/001010.html

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/9901,hentoff,3231,6.html

(sarcasm)
Then again, the Village Voice has always been notoriously Right-Wing...
(/sarcasm)

2006-09-18 12:26:40 · 20 answers · asked by Simon Templar 2

( I think he's reading the gorey Old Testament stuff more than anything)

2006-09-18 12:24:09 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-18 12:23:16 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

First of all I am not a muslim, but I do feel that true muslims do NOT distort their faith. This means that any muslim who commits these serious attrocities is not a true muslim. Read about the faith of Islam. It does not condone this violence. Radical muslims feel this way because they have been opressed for so long they can't think about anything else, and everyone is an infidel to them. They have twisted their religion to fit their purpose, but not all of them are like that. They don't speak out because it's not their nature to do so. They have been taught to deal with things within their own circle. I not only read everything I can to better understand these people, but someday I hope it is safe enough to travel to the Mid East to visit holy sites. If you are not of the intellectual type please do not answer my question. No stupid people here.

2006-09-18 12:22:47 · 7 answers · asked by sicilia 2

saying we havent been hit a SECOND time.....kinda stupid

2006-09-18 12:17:48 · 20 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

Don't people understand that we need secret military courts or else we'll never be able to convict these terrorists. All the information they gave us will be inadmissible in a normal court because we tortured it out of them. And without "heresay" being admissible their defense lawyers will tear us to shreds. And if we don't have to even show them the evidence against them we can just say it's really, really secret and then make stuff up.

Do you want these people convicted or not? And don't go throwing the Bill of Rights or the Geneva Convention or the Supreme Court in Bush's face - those things are for "enemies of freedom".

2006-09-18 12:08:22 · 18 answers · asked by Whoops, is this your spleeen? 6

fedest.com, questions and answers