English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My friend Matt really wants to know.

2006-09-18 13:57:32 · 40 answers · asked by ms_upsidedown 4 in Politics & Government Politics

40 answers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSoBpe_Fr_8
tell your friend to watch this video ,then decide.
i think he will veiw the president alot differently.

2006-09-18 14:00:05 · answer #1 · answered by Pussycat 4 · 2 3

George Bush is a great president. He's very good at getting elected by a whisker and then getting revenge on Sadam for the 1993 assasination attempt on his father. So what if that destabilizes the mid-east and costs 1000s of young people their lives. I think history will rate him about ten places below Nixon. He is not qualified to be president. He is incompetent and naive and has no understanding of foreign policy. He did go to Yale but he didn't let that go to his head. It's going to take 8 years of Hillary and Obama to clean up his mess!

2006-09-18 14:20:03 · answer #2 · answered by gone 7 · 0 0

Your friend Matt needs to read up on the Presidents and George Bush. He can then decide for himself.

2006-09-18 14:01:56 · answer #3 · answered by abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 6 · 4 0

Great at destroying lives and killing thousands of innocent people.

Great at mobilizing the absolute stupidest people in America to get out and vote for him (when they aren't busy beating their spouses or having sex with their children and family pets).

It took a lot of great people and over 200 years to make America, not only the greatest, but the most respected and admired nation in the history of mankind -

and it took Bush less than one year to destroy it all.

I guess that makes you happy if you happen to be an ignorant white-trash conservative piece of Christian scum -

The Founding Fathers greatest fear - next to organized religion -
was a population stupid enough to be fooled by dishonest politicians that were as stupid as the people who elected them.

That sure sounds like the Bush clan and religious right.






Hey Patrick m ---

maybe I can help you.

The first step towards recovery is recognizing and admitting that you have an intelligence problem:

–you don’t have any intelligence, and that’s the problem.

Let’s start with your nonsense, and see where it leads:

Only weeks after Clinton took office in 1993 (following 12 straight years of Republican presidents), terrorist scum tried to bring down the towers.

What did Clinton do?

- within a month, four people were arrested,
- they went on trial that September,
- the trial lasted 6 months, and
- they were all convicted

Are you aware that Clinton stopped eight 9/11-size attacks, despite a Republican Congress that tried to stop his every move?

Are you aware that the very first thing that Clinton did, as he was leaving the White House and Bush was moving in, was to tell Bush that the single greatest threat to the safety of the American people was Osama Bin-Laden. He had his staff stress to Bush’s staff that this was the most important thing Bush needed to know now that he was President.

Are you aware that on August 6, 2001, Bush received a PDBM (President's Daily Briefing Memo) warning that:

- OBL was planning an attack inside the United States, and
- that he might use airplanes, and
- that the targets would be politically important (DC) and major metropolitan centers (NYC)?


Are you aware that Bush, Rice, and the rest of the Bush administration ignored the memo?

Are you aware that the Bush administration abandoned the Israeli – Palestinian issue?

Are you aware that Bush abandoned the war on terror to invade Iraq which, according to your own Republican Congress’s report on pre-war intelligence:

- there were NO terrorists in Iraq before Bush invaded
- there was no connection between Iraq and OBL, AQ, or any terrorist organization
- Hussein did not provide training camps to terrorists
- Hussein hated AQ before we did
- Hussein did not hide al-Zargawi - he tried to have him arrested

Are you aware that the Taliban are stronger in Afghanistan now than they were before Bush invaded?

That opium production is Afghanistan is at record levels and the money from it fills terrorist’s pockets.

Are you aware that Bush is losing in Iraq?

Are you aware that Bush is losing the war on terror?

Are you aware that Bush has destroyed America’s dignity, honor, and reputation?

Of course you are aware of all this because, after all, deep inside you really hate America and what it stands for.

You know these things and yet you support Bush, because like all right-wing scum you are an idiot and, worse, a traitor to the United States who supports the spilling of American blood on the altar of Osama Bin-Laden.

Will your lust for American blood be satisfied when Republicans have killed more Americans than OBL and AQ?

The First Amendment does not say that stupid white-trash Christian Republican scum get to make the rules and run the country.

2006-09-18 14:13:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He is one of the greatest liars of all time. He is also a great con artist. Tell Matt that all he has to do is go to the library and look at all the past newspapers dating back to the year 2000 and he'll have his answers.......

2006-09-18 14:06:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well at least ,you have one intelligent friend, History will show,
President George W. Bush as the best , Unlike the respondents
to your question , who at best, demonstrated their limited intellect.

2006-09-18 14:09:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

depends largely on which George Bush you're talking about.
The son is an idiot, and will go down in history as one of the worst presidents of the 20th century!

2006-09-18 14:03:56 · answer #7 · answered by Clarkie 6 · 1 2

He is the greatest president since Clinton, and he is almost as honest as Clinton.

2006-09-18 14:36:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He'd be a great resident... in a mental institution. Would be lots of fun for scientists trying to discover what is it that can make a person be THAT stupid.

2006-09-18 14:10:23 · answer #9 · answered by Ricardo P 3 · 0 0

Not the greatest, not the worst. He has had to deal with more bad and controversial shït than any recent president, and thus is bound to have a load of detracters.

People can whine and toss out simplistic solutions all they want ... reality is in this environment no one would have high ratings and none of the simplistic solutions (mine included) would have been better.

2006-09-18 14:03:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Come, Come.. Bush, Great is an OXYMORON. No is the answer to both parts of your question.

2006-09-18 14:33:00 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers