saying we havent been hit a SECOND time.....kinda stupid
2006-09-18 12:17:48 · 20 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Agreed
2006-09-18 12:19:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Actually, there have been six 9/11s since he took office, 2001 was just the one everyone remembers, because that day was the turning point in how we view our safety. Many think that, somehow, Bush has protected us all from another attack. Stupid, naive, ignorant, or whatever word you choose to attach, we are in worse danger than we have ever been, from more nations in the world than ever before. As long as Bush continues to galvanize the world against us, even those to our north, how safe can we be?
What will happen if Bush snubs the Geneva Convention rules, or the UN leaders? Does anyone honestly believe that Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Afghanistan, or any number of other countries would not jump at the chance to destroy us, on our own soil? You better believe they would pounce in an instant, especially when we think it can't happen again because of the Homeland Security Act that is in place. That will only hold up as long as there are no attacks.
2006-09-18 13:01:30 · answer #2 · answered by Schona 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do you honestly think that 9-11 was planned from January to September? The answer is no. It was planned long before Bush got into office. How about you ask a question that has something behind it? You make no sense.
2006-09-18 12:21:36 · answer #3 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
This is true, but Bill Clinton knew that there was a plan to attack us, and he did nothing. While Clinton was in office the terrorist cowards attacked the WTC in 1993, our embassies, and our battleship USS Cole in Yemen. Clinton did nothing. He ignored the intel. Since 911 there have been no attacks, and that's because Bush is tough on terrorist cowards. Also, according to the news reports, we have been busting terror attack plots left, and right, and that's thanks to the NSA wire taps the Libs love to hate!
2006-09-18 12:23:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clinton surrendered to the terrorists.
That brought about the attack on the Cole and 9/11.
Muslims terrorists always go after cowards.
They know that the Democrats are trying to make this country weak.
WE WILL PAY FOR IT!!!!!
2006-09-18 12:24:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah
2006-09-22 09:38:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah. People also ignore that foreign terrorist attacks on US soil happen roughly every 7-9 years. So, Bush doesn't get much credit for not blowing the average and having an attack sooner.
2006-09-18 12:20:26 · answer #7 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Clinton had Bin laden and eight years and left the mess for President Bush who had eight month and what Clinton had left of an intelligence community.
2006-09-18 12:23:13 · answer #8 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Instead of blaming Bush for something that he had no control over, why not give him credit for the hundreds of billions of dollars in debt he's wracking up because of this war, or the tens of thousands of civilian deaths he's brought about, or his cutting edge methods of eroding civil liberties, or his deft ability to alienate almost all of our allies and fritter away our international goodwill, or his campaign to bring freedom and democracy to the world and to prove that we are Godly people!!!
Geesh, why must we always be so negative.
2006-09-18 12:24:25 · answer #9 · answered by Whoops, is this your spleeen? 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Well, there will be a second time. He is not out of office yet.
2006-09-18 12:22:20 · answer #10 · answered by To Be 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋