Other - Politics & Government - July 2006

2006-07-24 22:19:19 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-24 22:17:44 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.calodges.org/no406/FAMASONS.HTM
/\/\

http://www.trosch.org/msn/mason-graphics.html#bond

2006-07-24 22:17:22 · 2 answers · asked by Assmist 1

Who would take over and what would that mean ?

2006-07-24 22:15:59 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Today Dr Rice left Israle and she's going to Rome. What iz she doing in Rome?

2006-07-24 22:06:37 · 5 answers · asked by The King 2

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/Federal%20Reserve%20Scam/kennedy_killed_by_bankers.htm
On June 4, 1963, a little known attempt was made to strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the government at interest. On that day President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110 that returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve. Mr. Kennedy's order gave the Treasury the power "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This meant that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation. In all, Kennedy brought nearly $4.3 billion in U.S. notes into circulation. The ramifications of this bill are enormous.

With the stroke of a pen, Mr. Kennedy was on his way to putting the Federal Reserve Bank of New York out of business. If enough of these silver certificates were to come into circulation they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve notes. This is because the silver certificates are backed by silver and the Federal Reserve notes are not backed by anything. Executive Order 11110 could have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level, because it would have given the government the ability to repay its debt without going to the Federal Reserve and being charged interest in order to create the new money. Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S. the ability to create its own money backed by silver.

After Mr. Kennedy was assassinated just five months later, no more silver certificates were issued. The Final Call has learned that the Executive Order was never repealed by any U.S. President through an Executive Order and is still valid. Why then has no president utilized it? Virtually all of the nearly $6 trillion in debt has been created since 1963, and if a U.S. president had utilized Executive Order 11110 the debt would be nowhere near the current level. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to future presidents who would think to eliminate the U.S. debt by eliminating the Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. Mr. Kennedy challenged the government of money by challenging the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt - war and the creation of money by a privately-owned central bank. His efforts to have all troops out of Vietnam by 1965 and Executive Order 11110 would have severely cut into the profits and control of the New York banking establishment. As America's debt reaches unbearable levels and a conflict emerges in Bosnia that will further increase America's debt, one is force to ask, will President Clinton have the courage to consider utilizing Executive Order 11110 and, if so, is he willing to pay the ultimate price for doing so?

2006-07-24 22:03:25 · 9 answers · asked by Tank Stillton 2

now and oll the time pepoale kill,old mans and old woman ,chield girls womans kill and atck by isrealy wapins ,and us and uk do nathing.why us give israeal one moor week to stop the war?to just kill moor pepoale and to dostroy the countery?its no fuckin fear in this world.watching t>v and you will see how mieny pepoale killss every day,and leveing with out water and food and alctrce.what do u think .is that **** fear?

2006-07-24 21:51:37 · 14 answers · asked by sambob71 1

2006-07-24 21:23:04 · 14 answers · asked by formanite_7206 1

2006-07-24 21:12:47 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-24 21:10:56 · 3 answers · asked by skarygurl 1

2006-07-24 21:05:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

in the same department?

2006-07-24 20:59:55 · 6 answers · asked by R.I.P. 4

and many of them are hold key positions in usa economy which means in business stockmarket etc

2006-07-24 20:45:23 · 19 answers · asked by freaky k 1

look out cause here it comes again..

2006-07-24 20:38:25 · 9 answers · asked by Tank Stillton 2

On these wars going on? Because that's all I see posted.....all opinions no REAL solutions. It doesn't matter what country you are from, or what religion you belong, there is but one God, and He is the God of Love....otherwise you are worshiping the Devil. Everything communicated to another affects the rest. Whose side are you on, and which will you stand up for? Any solutions?

2006-07-24 20:37:44 · 11 answers · asked by jazzzame 4

2006-07-24 19:58:23 · 7 answers · asked by Turbo 1

I was just wondering how long it usually takes to get the actual letter in mail..I live in Texas. It is being sent to Austin I went to court in Mckinney...Anyone help?

2006-07-24 19:52:54 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

O is it being left up to the generous, Christian America again?

2006-07-24 19:45:19 · 5 answers · asked by zeepogee 3

Israel dropped warning leaflets into the towns that were harboring Hezbollah terrorists. They warned of military operations. Why can't the terrorists warn Israelis of their impending attacks?
OH, YEAH...because they're TERRORISTS TARGETING INNOCENT CIVILIANS?
Help me out here.

2006-07-24 19:44:59 · 12 answers · asked by LastNerveLost 3

2006-07-24 19:38:31 · 7 answers · asked by Turbo 1

Can you legitimately whine when you get bombed because of said rocket launcher in your spare bedroom?

2006-07-24 19:26:57 · 15 answers · asked by LastNerveLost 3

2006-07-24 19:15:14 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

You think a C- student would know that he doesn't have the mind or brain for this job.

2006-07-24 19:05:35 · 43 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-24 19:04:25 · 14 answers · asked by VickieMolina 1

2006-07-24 19:00:24 · 2 answers · asked by please tell 1

We are sure by now, that if the western world, mostly us and uk, had another policy agaist some countries (IRAK-PALESTINE-IRAN), terrorism could not exist now. Are the US responsible for terrorism?

2006-07-24 18:59:56 · 11 answers · asked by olaola 2

2006-07-24 18:56:27 · 5 answers · asked by jacking_best 1

Do you think he's a mistake or a good president.

2006-07-24 18:47:37 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-24 18:40:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-24 18:39:55 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous