English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-24 22:19:19 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Jimmy your tracking my intent for the question.

2006-07-24 22:40:01 · update #1

4 answers

well. domestic resistance , changed nations, for example in Egypt during the reign of monarchs, there have been tons of movements led by a group of ppl called al wafad to help an entire nation get rid of the Brits. And eventually they did ... in the form of a coup d'eta led by Gamal Naser... another example is Ghandi in india , this is another form of Domestic resistance, that worked ..Domestic resistance is thorn in any invader's side, it might not bear fruit right away , however , it works in the long term. And that is why, nations with colonial intentions , need to nip any form of resistance in the bud.. however , it thrives , because their drive is more powerful and it feeds on the people ... and it just can not be dethroned

2006-07-24 23:49:34 · answer #1 · answered by interested 4 · 2 0

There are different scenarios we can come up with as regards to the role resistance domestically plays on military. But basing on history of several nations (Iran, Chile, Guatemala, Vietnam, the Philippines) we can say that military actions were the effect of domestic resistance on these countries against the vested interests of, for example, the US government. Take for example Iran. By curtailing the interests of the British government on the Anglo-Iran Oil corp by domestic government, their allies, the US, came to their aid by establishing a propaganda of "evil communism" against the wealthy Iranians. This led to a series of attacks to the country. And much of these are all propaganda to topple over governments resisting to the interests of foreign governments.

2006-07-24 22:34:03 · answer #2 · answered by Joy RP 4 · 0 0

The citizens must unite to confront the military action. They should organize a local militia for combat operations and the civilian sector for intelligence. They should not provide any food and shelter to the enemies.

2006-07-24 22:29:19 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

It depends on whether your actions(demonstrations) are against a war your government is involved in. Like Vietnam. It was demonstrations on the home front that made the government take
actions toward peace. If your government isn't directly involved in the conflict you're demonstrating against, it won't do much good.
In fact you're wasting your time, and energy.

2006-07-24 22:35:39 · answer #4 · answered by Jimmythekid 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers