Government - November 2007

I know the amount of money our government is spending on Iraq is astronomical but what is approx. dollar amount to date? Vote for Ron Paul and Keep Government Out of Our Lives. The Bush Campain is Destroying Our Constitutional Rights...Bring Our Troops Home!

2007-11-17 16:12:59 · 5 answers · asked by moore4michael 1

2007-11-17 14:46:45 · 30 answers · asked by hasselblad 3

In Michigan there was a grand jury case where there was a proposal to take away the poeples right to vote for the presidential primaries. Nobody took it seriously nor new about it, sounds imposible. The judges said that they would never even concider voting in favor of ot. Within a week the judges who appossed it the most and lobbied against it for some reason (HUMMM I WONDER WHY, Could it be political conspieracy fueled by $$$). So it passed and the constitutional right's of the peoples right to vote was violated and there's nothing we can do abought it (sounds a little like apartide, don't it). What's next? how far will they go before the people get mad enough to exercise their right to bear arms and use them. Pretty soon the presidential election will only be voted for by the governors.

Is the time now? I'm so damn mad I'm almost to the point where I'm ready to go at it if you are. What do you think?

Sorry about the misspelled words my spell check doesn't work.

2007-11-17 13:19:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Where do I go to take that off my Social Security Card?

2007-11-17 11:58:35 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

for example pros and cons of democracy, comuinism, totalism, and plutocracy.

2007-11-17 11:56:15 · 1 answers · asked by Slsigh 1

Ron Paul has promised that, if elected, he would abolish the Federal Reserve, return to the gold standard, abolish the IRS (and replace it with nothing), and radically reduce the size of the federal government.

What is the worst thing that could happen if this happened? What would likely happen short and long term?

2007-11-17 11:41:29 · 10 answers · asked by Jack 3

... Besides what portion of the country they oversee.

2007-11-17 11:09:58 · 5 answers · asked by Kendra V 1

Bin laden is still at large , the war in iraq is lost , nearly four thousand US soldiers died for an illegal war , the economy is weak , the housing market is in deep trouble , the US dollar is in freefall ........ do you agree he is a real whacker or loser ?

2007-11-17 11:09:02 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

had Bill silck willy Clinton been more occupied on his presidency instead of games with monica, he would have prevented 9/11. Now as proof you should read "Jaw Breaker" by Gary Berntsen.

How many of you out there have read that excellent book, and discovered some truth about how Clinton is 90% the reason 9/11 happened.

2007-11-17 10:56:37 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-17 10:18:30 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-17 09:07:59 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Read the following article and respond:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/451114/hail_to_the_presidents_of_the_united.html

Additionally, Congress is essentially comprised of the same kind of people that become president--people with a basic knowledge of everything, but experts in nothing. Congress was created to be a form of checks and balances, and to have them legislating left and right seems counterproductive. I think by splitting the executive branch into specific parts, where the president of those areas spends their time focusing solely on the issues affecting that area, would allow for more to get done.


Not only would the government be more productive, but the proposals/bills coming across Congress would be better thought out and more effective if they get passed.

The only real problem I see is with each department asking for too much money for whatever issue they are trying to resolve. That is why Congress would act more as a form of checks and balances/debt preventi

2007-11-17 08:50:55 · 7 answers · asked by Joe D 1

excuse the weird question it is for history i looked everywhere for the answer and still cant find it :[

2007-11-17 08:44:55 · 4 answers · asked by cheerxO 1

Why would EVERYONE (presumably in the world) need to know the answer to a question like that?)

2007-11-17 08:36:01 · 4 answers · asked by logie ogie 3

Do we just accept that the opinion of the government is more informed and better than our own ? That because they are better paid better educated better fed and better housed than ourselves that they also know better how to spend the money you gave them and the resources you prduced for them ?
That the government is right to ignore the people from time to tiime - even though the people are the wealth of the nation because there is no way the masses could make these decisons without the upper class corperations lawyers and other "pro's" ?
Why is it we the people are in constant deferrment to the governng body and how have we changed since the old days of Kings - Isn't today's government a spit in the face to all those who fought wars on our behalf to gain just the tiniest bits of freedoms from our masters ?
70 % of the population wants out of Iraq in the US 66 % of Cdns want out of Afganistan the government who makes up less than 1/2 a % wants to "stay the course" We pay we die

2007-11-17 08:30:21 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

in the early 21st century?

2007-11-17 08:28:29 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

I know we flood Israel with billions of dollars each year, even though they have a higher gdp per capita than Germany and Italy, and are the 16th wealthiest country, but what about the other countries? How much does the US give them? sources please...

2007-11-17 08:04:37 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hi, I have to find out about the foreign affairs of the above party. What apprach does it take towards the EU? (I can't find anything in English or French...) Thanks a lot!
anita

2007-11-17 07:28:34 · 3 answers · asked by Anita K 1

2007-11-17 07:08:14 · 4 answers · asked by ((LOON)) 6

REMEMBER the MUSLIM bombing of Pan Am Flight 103!
> REMEMBER the MUSLIM bombing of the World Trade
> Center in 1993! REMEMBER the MUSLIM bombing of the
> Marine Barracks in Lebanon! REMEMBER the MUSLIM
> bombing of the military Barracks in Saudi Arabia!
> REME MBER the MUSLIM bombing of the American
> Embassies in Africa! REMEMBER the MUSLIM bombing of
> the USS COLE! REMEMBER the MUSLIM attack on
> 9/11/2001! REMEMBER all the AMERICAN lives that were
> lost in those vicious MUSLIM attacks! Now the United
> States Postal Service REMEMBERS and HONORS the EID
> MUSLIM holiday season with a commemorative first
> class Holiday postage stamp. Bull! REMEMBER to
> adamantly and vocally BOYCOTT this stamp When
> purchasing your stamps at the post office. To use
> this stamp would be a slap in the face to all those
> AMERICANS who died at the hands of those whom this
> stamp honors. REMEMBER to pass this along to every
> patriotic AMERICAN you know!!!

2007-11-17 06:31:40 · 8 answers · asked by ? 3

2007-11-17 06:15:58 · 7 answers · asked by Hayley 1

This a funny thing voters of the time are not the smartest becuase they tend to vote the other way because they think that it is the time to change something that is not bad. For example a lot of the people are going to the polls in 2008 to vote for a Democrat because they feel it is time to change.

Well they are not smart because when that democrat comes into office they are going to turn their backs on the people. Then when they stop this war there will be another terrorist attack. Then people are going to ask "why did Congress and the President take us out of the war?" Then these people will blame the government when it was the medias fault and their fault for not seeing the true reason behind this war.

And the true reason for this war was to give Iraqi people freedom. Also Saddam said that he would like to take over the US. When the decision to have this war or not it was asked "will we have any freedoms in the future if we do not have this war?"

2007-11-17 04:41:07 · 10 answers · asked by bee bee boo 3

Why do all Ministers need such high salaries and lavish lifestyles (minus legitmate job expenses of course). What a welcome shock it would be to us hard-pressed taxpayers if suddenly along came a Prime Minister who insisted in living in a council house, and driving around in a mini.
He`d probably get voted out for being such a crackpot eccentric!

2007-11-17 04:02:00 · 12 answers · asked by B0uncingMoonman@aol.com 7

2007-11-17 02:53:54 · 19 answers · asked by MAYA 5

2007-11-17 02:30:19 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

My mom is a raving socialist and I'm telling her that you can't rob Peter to pay Paul. Yet she still spews venom such as saying that taxing the rich is simply "nudging."

Am I truly nuts for seriously disliking my mother as a person?

2007-11-17 02:15:36 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

If all they want is our money won't they be lossing money working here? Is that thproblem solver for the economy also forcing production back in the USA?

Wow immigartion and economics saved by the falling dollar.!

2007-11-17 00:54:29 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-16 22:02:55 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-16 20:50:36 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-16 18:40:30 · 7 answers · asked by suresh kumar 1