Elections - November 2007

(1) He is just as bad, if not worst. Yet, many people will vote for him. (2) Do you approve of outright killing and murder? (3) Would the American people go along with this?

During World War II, Hitler killed 6 million Jews, God's people. Germans are Catholic (Christians) shouldn't they have know better? And how, then, did a maniacal Hitler come to power? How about George W. Bush? And the same goes for Rudy Giuliani. Hillary Clinton, though, labeled a Democrat is no different from these two.

Obama is green and HAS little or no integrity, when you challenge him, he falls down as it has been proven. Robertson, Kucinish, and Ron Paul seem to be a little crazy to many people. When you hear them speak, they seem like nutcases trying to do away with health care, social security, and the Internal Revenue Service.

What Kucinich is doing by trying to have Cheney impeached is a good move on his part. Ron Paul though being a far-fetched libertarian, is right on the Iraq War (best candidate).

2007-11-12 11:10:52 · 10 answers · asked by peacenegotiator 3

Wake up people, do you really think you have a say in what goes on in this country. The next President has already been pick out by the corporations of the world. This is why I don't vote.

2007-11-12 10:49:13 · 12 answers · asked by Lonewolf 4

What kind of true American would vote for a candidate that refuses to cover their heart while our American anthem is being played, That is a Muslim and has Hussein as a middle name ?

2007-11-12 10:47:39 · 21 answers · asked by Paul S 4

2007-11-12 10:35:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

If Hillary becomes president the situation in the middle east will only get worse. Why would the arabic countries, who dont give women any rights at all, listen to a woman president?

2007-11-12 10:01:26 · 18 answers · asked by someone20someone20 2

if predicting the left will only worsen matters, domestically or internationally, isnt the right simply admitting the past 6 years have been horrible for all Americans?

2007-11-12 09:30:42 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Australian Institute has worked out the best Location for these Nuclear Power Stations Eg : the Most Suitable

Queensland: Townsville, Mackay, Rockhamton, Gladstone
Bunderberg, Sunshine Coast, Bribie Island.

New South Wales : Port Stephens,Central Coast,Botany Bay,Port Kembla, Jervis Bay / Sussex Inlet.

Victoria : South Gippsland, Western Port, Port Philip, Portland.

South Australia : Mt Gambier / Millicent, Port Adelaide, Port Augusta / Port Pirie.

I wonder how many of these Location would like such Nuclear Power stations in their back yards, And who are the sitting members in these locations.

Source can be found at

www.readersdigest.com.au

on the pros and cons of such .

But there is no mention of Western Australia, Tasmania , ACT, or the NT.

It would be very interesting to see how many are a liberal seat. or a labour seat.

2007-11-12 09:07:04 · 6 answers · asked by the.texican 3

2007-11-12 08:45:26 · 13 answers · asked by Elias P 1

2007-11-12 08:13:32 · 9 answers · asked by saleh a 2

Some candidates have actually offered up firm plans for how they would handle issues like the Iraq War and Social Security. I read about Ron Paul who is going to change everything... But does he actually have the ability to do it? Does he have any firm plan? Not looking for haters here. I'm an Obama man, myself. I'm just wondering why there's so much hype over a candidate who only has 2% in polls.

2007-11-12 07:49:31 · 23 answers · asked by Blake 3

...which candidate would abolish the 2nd amendment the quickest?

2007-11-12 07:45:45 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-12 07:31:46 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

...will his vast fortune snuff out the other compitition?

2007-11-12 07:16:23 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

i think bush is

2007-11-12 07:16:22 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

REFUSED TO NOT ONLY PUT HIS HAND ON HIS HEART DURING THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, BUT REFUSED TO SAY THE PLEDGE

2007-11-12 07:07:19 · 9 answers · asked by smoothfriend4u 1

ridiculous arguments like "the Democrats want America to fail" or "the Democrats care about the terrorists' feelings"??

If that's what they really believed, do you really think half the country would really support them as poll after poll after poll indicates?? I have a lot of conservative views, but the intellectual dishonesty rampant among Republicans is what is destroying this country.

I never hear this kind of insanity from Democrats...the closest comparison you could make is when some people say that oil was the motivation for Iraq or that Bush is stupid, but both of these are at least quite possible and can be backed up with some evidence, and they do not generalize about the entire party...

2007-11-12 06:54:36 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

It is happening now. It is all over alternative news and sites such as myspace for those who seek more than main stream media for knowlege. Big business that owns major media is determining who can and cannot be a part of presidential candidate debates. It is unconstitutional and an abstruction of our democratic process. The constitution determines who is quailfied to run for office and NBC and CNN have denied candidates on the foundation of money. If a candidate already has money why do they need to get more? If the object is to repair our nation with the hope of a better leader why are they requireing the candidates to sell out to dontaions. We are the leaders we choose. Are we strong enough to go against big business?

2007-11-12 06:43:52 · 10 answers · asked by Beckie 1

2007-11-12 06:28:33 · 14 answers · asked by jskmarden 4

Hillary and the rest of her Democrat followers feel as though the American government should be responsible for providing healthcare to Americans (and illegal immigrants in America). My question is this… How many people agree with her? Keep in mind that nothing is free. If the government takes on the payment of healthcare it is not Hillary that will pay for it but the average American! The rich have ways to avoid paying taxes; the poor don’t make enough money to pay a lot of taxes (if any). That means the middle class American will suffer! We could expect at least a 30% increase in taxes with Hillary’s plan. The middle class American, the group the Dems claim to be concerned about, will be hurt.
Now if healthcare is provided by the government there will be people who will not qualify for free healthcare. People who smoke, drink, eat unhealthy foods… this will be a never ending list of people who cannot get healthcare yet are forced to pay for it.

There are a lot more reasons why

2007-11-12 06:21:40 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-12 06:06:34 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

It's so interesting to see the comments about Hillary Clinton. Lots of her opponents here call her ugly, a dyke, a lesbian, unfeminine, power hungry, too aggressive and use the B word a lot, as if being pretty, feminine and demure were necessary qualities to hold public office if you're female. But at the same time, people call her too weak, say she's too prone to cry, worry about her menstrual cycle, and say other things that suggest she's not strong enough to wield the power of the presidency.

It seems like we want women candidates to be simultaneously the image of feminine beauty and at the same time tough s.o.b.s Do we set impossible standards for women candidates?

2007-11-12 05:48:28 · 11 answers · asked by Candy 5

we just keep making more and more and buying more and more, even as prices are rising. I think the people need to make some changes for ourselves; we need to slow down and stop trying to beat the Joneses, right now I think that is the only way that we are going to avoid a depression.

2007-11-12 04:50:45 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Robin Williams' movie "Man of the Year" wasn't just humor, after all. We are in fact putting computerized voting into place all over the country. Any number of people have demonstrated that it is easy to hack into the computers used and change votes. Do you think it's still possible to have a (reasonably) fair election in the US?

2007-11-12 04:21:00 · 7 answers · asked by auntb93 7

A. Hillary Clinton
B. Rudy Giuliani
C. Micheal Bloomberg
D. Stay Home and not vote
Please pick one, or be reported

2007-11-12 04:14:05 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

...still say he's a second tier candidate & will never win because nobody knows him? From what I'm reading/hearing it sounds like the nay sayers, or at least a FAIR amount of them are the less "fortunate" amongst our society. Might these nay sayers be frightened that a Paul administration might "touch off" their statusy lil "entitlement" checks? I mean theres a lot of chronic drunks/druggies out there that look forwards once a month to that SSI disability check so they can keep "indulging". Then there's the folks that have been diagnosed with ERGOPHOBIA, or the fear of work that qualifies them for SSI benefits as it is classified as a true medical disorder. Sounds to me like there's just a lot of American's that like "dinging the pooch" & want a free ride at the productive folks expense! What's your take on the nay sayers?

2007-11-12 03:08:19 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Would you support the Team who took out an American President (or Congress) in the event of treason, then called for a new election?
.

2007-11-12 02:18:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think a vote for Hillary is actually a vote for Bill Clinton

2007-11-12 02:17:48 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/buffaloerie/story/204205.html

The unions run NY State, and this is how they care about taxpayers. Their rhetoric is SO thick at election time, and they claim to fight for the poor. Actually, by taxing the daylights out of us they drive away business and jobs. They only care about abusing the system, and we constantly hear their sob stories come election time. The problem I have is how the Liberals believe it.

2007-11-12 01:11:17 · 2 answers · asked by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-clinton_12nov12,1,3427742.story?track=rss

2007-11-12 00:50:41 · 7 answers · asked by Naturescent 4

"Bill Clinton","Family Values"? "The Rose Law Firm"? "Travel-Gate"? "Kathleen E. Willey", "Monica Lewinsky", "Paula Jones", "Jennnifer Flowers"?, "Perjury", "Bimbo Eruptions"
"New York State"? (just as Economically depressed as the first day she became Senator), "Ruthless"? "Solution-less"?, "Manipulating"?, "Packaged"?, "Scripted"?

These are what a random sampling of 35 to 45 year old adults stated as to what came to their minds when asked this same question for a survey last month conducted by World Today.

What say you?

2007-11-12 00:47:08 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous