2007-11-12 08:45:26 · 13 answers · asked by Elias P 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
There is only one canidate that fits that bill.
Ron Paul
2007-11-12 08:48:21 · answer #1 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Ron Paul sounds like a good choice except for the pro-union part. Realistically though, a vote for him will just be a vote for Hellary.
2007-11-16 16:26:48 · answer #2 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul cannot possibly be pro-union. That would require allowing the Federal Government to regulate corporate power. Sorry, what I meant was he can't possibly be pro-union and consistent.
2007-11-12 17:23:36 · answer #3 · answered by M M 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
None. Ron Paul is not pro-union.
2007-11-16 16:32:03 · answer #4 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably Ron Paul, being a republican he should be Pro life and Pro-gun. I saw the republican debate and I know for sure he wants to bring the troops home
2007-11-12 16:53:52 · answer #5 · answered by Smartie Pants 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Mitt Romney
All candidates want to bring the troops home. They just can't do a cut and run. That way always ends bloody for the troops leaving.
2007-11-12 18:04:15 · answer #6 · answered by LDS Mom 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Ron Paul.
2007-11-12 19:25:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
None of the viable candidates meet these criteria.
2007-11-13 08:08:31 · answer #8 · answered by bill j 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah that Ron Paul nut. I mean... Apparently it's that nut Ron Paul.
2007-11-12 18:53:02 · answer #9 · answered by Stone K 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Probably Ron Paul.
He is probably pro-union as far as he supports freedom of association, but I am sure he rejects the union's socialist politics.
In my opinion, that is why unions have failed in the USA, we are a capitalist nation, but most unions are run by communists.
2007-11-12 16:56:45 · answer #10 · answered by freedom_vs_slavery 3 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Ron Paul is not in favor of bringing our troops home, so you can cancel him out.
2007-11-12 17:09:16 · answer #11 · answered by Laura/Renna 3 · 2⤊ 6⤋