Elections - November 2007

Its looking like the Texas Congressman may just have a chance to pull off the shock of the century and get at least top two in NH. But can he win the state who's motto is 'live free or die'? Be nice people, im just asking!

2007-11-25 11:41:42 · 21 answers · asked by Paul F 2

2007-11-25 10:46:16 · 17 answers · asked by spiffy 1

Firstly what a great weekend, I actually changes my views and voted for change ! (surprising but true !). I still admire Howard, but can now see he was divisive and maybe Costello wasn't the devil after all. So Will Turnbull be a threat to Rudd in 3-4 years time ? Or is Australias wealthiest Politician far to alianated from ordinary Australians ? Lets face it the spoilt rich electorate he owns is !

2007-11-25 10:21:11 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

At least one candidate implies our tax money can cover everyone for health care.
1) If one cannot afford health care out of pocket, how are we to afford it with our government guaranteeing profits regardless of outcome (health care that ends with miserable results still get paid the same as those with good results), and paying added fees for monitoring and administering the programs?
2) If employers are required to provide health care (while politicians repay support in the form of legislation guaranteeing high profit and strict eligibility that results in many people not able to access health care) and maintain standards that are not imposed on competitor nations, how does this promote employment in the USA and if jobs are lost, who will pay the taxes to support the national program?
3) If it is possible for a national health plan to cover all, will senators and our President then receive the same benefits as those paying taxes to support it (like it was prior to 1992?)

2007-11-25 09:53:20 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

The more people I talk to the more I am convinced that the top tear candidates attract more brainwashed monkeys then people of sense. This is not to say that there are not very well educated people who support Hillary, Giuliani and Obama. I am just pointing out with there name recognition and media propaganda they receive support from all the Americans that are not interested enough to look into it further themselves and those who are not capable of looking into it further.

2007-11-25 09:15:44 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-25 09:12:39 · 6 answers · asked by R J 7

2007-11-25 09:09:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Giuliani and Romney are the conservative frontrunners btth are very weak on immigration

http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html

And Hillary and Obama both support the war till 2013.

Why would you not support a candidate if you are not supporting their policies.

2007-11-25 08:59:53 · 8 answers · asked by Edge Caliber 6

http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html

2007-11-25 08:37:54 · 11 answers · asked by Edge Caliber 6

2007-11-25 08:36:07 · 17 answers · asked by R J 7

what outcome would we expect to see from the elctoral college if Ron Paul should come close to winning ?

How do you think that will work out ?

I am voting Ron Paul and just curious what the possibilities are ...

2007-11-25 07:48:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

How would that be for the ultimate Republican-slaying ticket?

2007-11-25 07:44:34 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-25 07:26:59 · 19 answers · asked by Joe 1

It would be hard to find a worse bunch of fakers! Here is the accomplishments of the leading candidates---a turncoat, a sham, one who could not keep it in, one who loves illegal Mexicans who come here to breed, and one who has trouble seeing what is really important for Americans!!

Huckabee is probably the most cosistent, whether you agree with him or not. As is McCain.

2007-11-25 07:22:37 · 13 answers · asked by paanbahar 4

im not sure i get this redistribution of the wealth ,why as a person who worked hard to have a 9 digit bank account why i should have to give my money away.


can some one explain the ideas of redistribution of wealth?

and how can that be constitutional?

2007-11-25 07:14:39 · 13 answers · asked by djominous20 5

She possibly will have to declare war to Iran. Why even bother electing a Dim?

2007-11-25 06:52:46 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

or vice versa?

2007-11-25 06:45:56 · 22 answers · asked by . 5

2007-11-25 06:02:14 · 19 answers · asked by fslcaptain737 4

2007-11-25 05:57:01 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

If the Clintons go back to the White House, there won't be anymore sex scandals?

2007-11-25 05:43:49 · 14 answers · asked by Lina 2

To be able to vote at election time for the President and Vice-President of their choice even across party lines-----this would let the electors know what the voters wanted. Party politics is too restrictive of the will of the people in my opinion.In article two of the Constitution which directs how to elect the President and Vice-President, I see no mention of going thru parties such as GOP and DEM. This is election reform--as it now stands about 5% of the nation's voters control the elections because of party politics.

2007-11-25 04:02:47 · 5 answers · asked by doubleolly 5

10 million kids will die from lack of medical care.
http://www.who.int/child-adolescent-health/New_Publications/CHILD_HEALTH/CS/CS_paper_1.pdf
200 million kids need adoption and will not be adopted.
http://ndas.cwla.org/include/pdf/InterntlAdoption_FINAL_IB.pdf
And there will be less than nine tenths of a million abortions of unwanted fetuses this year.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5511a1.htm?s_cid=ss5511a1_e
The problem in the world is not about "choosing Life" it is about who you choose to save. Do you save less than 1 million unwanted fetuses, or do you save 10 million kids. You have said that we should err on the side of "life". To err on the side of life one should err trying to save the most lives, not the least lives. The odds are that each time you try to save a fetus, you cause the death of 12 loved and wanted kids. http://www.prolifeismurder.com
If elected president,will you save the wanted kids or the unwanted fetuses? Please read all web sites first.

2007-11-25 02:45:16 · 10 answers · asked by Give me Liberty 5

i know its a odd question its a if,but if he ran i woild vote for him just on the issue if global warming,i believe in it ,when u see the arrtic ice melting temps at a all time high and,droughts u know theres a problem,there people who believe it in it some don't i will respect your opion,,,,i would vote for him in a ny minute..i really think this issue needs to be solved if it don't the earth wouldn't exsist for another 200 years sad to think..

2007-11-25 02:40:52 · 34 answers · asked by tornadoman1955 3

that the cleaning up that Hillary claims her husband undertook is a myth. The record shows Bill Clinton inherited from President George H.W. Bush an economy already in recovery.

It also shows that two terms of Clinton Masculinus left George W. Bush in 2001 with an economy already in a downturn.

2007-11-25 02:36:07 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am sure the Clinton's do

2007-11-25 02:32:23 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-25 02:24:38 · 7 answers · asked by natalie_rose78 2

you know how those southerners are. look how they treat their neighbors. "lie, deny, hope you die."

2007-11-25 02:18:56 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

watch.

2007-11-25 02:06:56 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you're a DEM and HAD to choase a REP candidate to support who would it be? Same for REPS, which DEM would you support, and why?

2007-11-25 02:06:19 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Some says that changing our politics against islamic terrorists (putting in the White House a President that leans toward appeasement), we'd have more respect from other nations of the world.
But who cares about respect? I want security.

Even if all the world should hate United States, homeland security has to be the first choice.
What's your opinion on this item?

2007-11-25 01:59:45 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous