I still say the ones at the bottom have the most experience, maybe not the most lobbyist money. That said we will have to see how Paul and Romney fair, Thompson, as those are the only ones that are debatable although the other two gentlemen are definitely against illegal. by the way I wouldn't count anyone out, a dark horse can pull in the end and how in the world was Hunter able to get a fence built in lib Cal with the 9th District court, he may have more than we think.. Buy the why you Canadians pay 50% in taxes, someone posted that. Wow. take care.
2007-11-25 11:25:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by R J 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The people who vote for war until 2013 are most likely going to win because the US has no interest in leaving Iraq anytime soon . As for the immigration , Politicians care more about how there hair looks then Mexican people or even there own voters ! So obviously they only support immigration to further the North American Union , which is right around the corner .
2007-11-25 09:58:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
The grade only reflects Thompsons record up until 2003. He's come out rather strong against illegal immigration since running for president.
Tancredo and Hunter are just not going to win the nomination. They may be great on immigration, but aren't strong enough in all aspects to become president. Sorry.
No point in addressing the democrats views on illegal immigration. They're for it, but won't come out and say it.
2007-11-25 10:28:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Candidates cross party platforms wherein conservatives supports some of the issues of the liberals vice versa. Thus, it is up to the people whom to support to have a good President.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-11-25 10:16:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Polls can be easily be minipulated. Thompson is fairly conservative and against immigration, as well as other conservative runners. Also, I think Hilary and Obama are only saying that to get votes.
2007-11-25 09:03:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anime_Warrior 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Now you're doing it. no longer all Conservatives think of that one and all liberals do something. there is not any evidence that marijuana is way less risky than tobacco. it is nevertheless respiration in risky smoke which damages the lungs. Tobacco frequently would not reason delusions and paranoia the two.
2016-10-18 02:49:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul is against both of these things. Polls do not mean anything $$ and who votes you matters.
2007-11-25 09:04:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
hillary and condi
2007-11-26 05:36:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋