10 million kids will die from lack of medical care.
http://www.who.int/child-adolescent-health/New_Publications/CHILD_HEALTH/CS/CS_paper_1.pdf
200 million kids need adoption and will not be adopted.
http://ndas.cwla.org/include/pdf/InterntlAdoption_FINAL_IB.pdf
And there will be less than nine tenths of a million abortions of unwanted fetuses this year.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5511a1.htm?s_cid=ss5511a1_e
The problem in the world is not about "choosing Life" it is about who you choose to save. Do you save less than 1 million unwanted fetuses, or do you save 10 million kids. You have said that we should err on the side of "life". To err on the side of life one should err trying to save the most lives, not the least lives. The odds are that each time you try to save a fetus, you cause the death of 12 loved and wanted kids. http://www.prolifeismurder.com
If elected president,will you save the wanted kids or the unwanted fetuses? Please read all web sites first.
2007-11-25
02:45:16
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Give me Liberty
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
GOP
The question reveals the fact that you may save 12 loved and wanted kids or 1 unwanted fetus. Are you saying it is better to save one unwanted fetus in stead of 12 born and loved kids? Please read the sources before answering.
2007-11-25
03:00:56 ·
update #1
Sorry GOP but most people don't want kids to die to save fetuses.
2007-11-25
03:50:57 ·
update #2
urbanfarmhouse
I give you the choice to save one fetus or 12 children and you choose to save the one and let the 12 die. Then you call yourself pro live and admonish me?
I will save 12 living and loved kids for each fetus you waste your time trying to save. I say "waste" because God takes 50% of fetuses through miscarriage and each one of those you attempt to save will be a waste of money that could have saved living kids. You waste money and life and then heap praises on yourself. I don't think any person that can do simple math will agree with you.
2007-11-25
04:29:41 ·
update #3
wizzard..
Actually, if saving one life causes the death of 12 others, there is no life saving going on. And that is what is proven by the fact that each attempt to save a fetus causes the death of 12 loved and wanted children.
2007-11-25
04:40:32 ·
update #4
SAVE THE UNBORN CHILDREN....what happens when they get here, well, that's somebody's else's problem.
This seems to be the logical thinking among the Pro-Life crowd. Not that I'm advocating free abortions for all, actually i'm not really for them. I just don't understand how you can force someone to have a child they don't want then walk away once the child gets here thinking your job is done.
Could a Pro-Lifer explain that one to me? If you support that cause should you be forced to, at the very least, adopt?
2007-11-25 02:58:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alex G 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
they are going to ought to deal with the guy themselves! they're unfastened to do as they please yet i do no longer approve of the two one. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that it extremely is there enterprise i assume, it basically a reality the physique became into made to artwork one way. there is an inney and an outey! some human beings only won't be ready to discern it out nonetheless. Now abortion, I also have a grey section on that concern. that's only homicide the two way you seem at it, no remember how some elect to candy coat it or attempt to make it sound acceptable. If somebody became into raped or if it is going to reason to mom to die or reason a existence long ailment or sickness, then that's the only way it ought to additionally be on the brink of ok. yet those females or women who only go out and get pregnant the two casually or reason in the back of stupidity, devoid of concept-approximately outcomes or regard to a human existence are only killing a babies!!!! Like I mentioned it extremely is murdering a living element that has no protection. That like cornering up a completely helpless guy or woman (or an animal) and taking there existence. same element! A thumbs down basically potential somebody is in denial, has been misinformed or is only attempting to candy coat it.......I recommend what if there mom had aborted them, they does no longer additionally be right here, they ought to have a similar mercy on there very own baby.... Sorry
2016-09-30 03:32:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The best way to stop abortions iis to use birth control pills and a condom.
If you didn't take precautions then you are liable for the life of the unborn child and by having an abortion you are committing murder.
If you are raped then you have enough time to see a doctor and stop the pregancy before it is too late because once it has a heart beat it is alive.
2007-11-25 03:05:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by The Cajun Mason 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Instead of insisting on promoting a culture of death, maybe pro-abortion advocates (you included) could take a breath and appreciate the life you have....it is heartbreaking to think that there is an element of society that actually believes abortion is an appropriate answer to anything. It is an unethical violation of basic human rights, an abomination to the very constitution it is (?) supposedly protected by, and a lazy solution for lazy people. Let's not forget the bill of goods sold to women by the "feminists" that abortion equals power - extinguishing the energy of human life is the antithesis of power. Grow up - surely someone as intelligent as you, asker of question, could provide a more productive service to society than encouraging the abject lie that abortion somehow solves problems - at best it puts a bandaid on a symptom - the issue is not at what level does life become important to us (as a culture), but is life important to us AT ALL. There are a lot of living dead among us - people with no existential insight or understanding of philosophical productivity, merely surviving. By your standard, we ought to knock them off, too. They are, after all, just taking up space and resources. How dare they! Get rid of them - it's easier than trying to actually solve problems. Although, that housing project thing in the inner cities, that was brilliant - that way they'll knock THEMSELVES off. Oh, and the UN...perfect. Make no decisions and take no action and "those people" will take care of everything the old fashioned way. And maybe China is on to something, with that drowning baby girls in rice paddies and what-not. What an improvement for all of us. What a wonderful world - thanks liberal socialist agenda! Self-loathing is awesome!
Instead of pretending to solve a problem with
dumbed down agenda driven research, why don't you put your effort where your mouth is and I don't know, adopt a child? Donate time to help young mothers improve their job skills?
Teach children in urban communities to finish school, and affect change in their own environments? Work a part time job and contribute all of your pay to a children's charity or hospital? Or is it just easier to get rid of them?
2007-11-25 04:09:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by urbanfarmhouse 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
I do not believe abortion is murder.
A woman's reasons to terminate a pregnancy are not the business of any one else.
I wonder if the fundies would mind so much the aborted fetuses that are gay.
I see so much hate, bigotry, and ignorance spouted here every day with people using the buy-bull as justification. It infuriates me.
This country was founded on the separation of church and state. That must be preserved. I will not allow any idiotic religious dogma to be forced on me through our laws without speaking out against it.
We absolutely must get the fundies out of our government.
We all must VOTE!
BTW, it is good to see you. It has been a while. You have my respect and affection.
2007-11-25 03:59:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think your thinking is a bit flawed logically-and I mean no disrespect to you at all. ANY life is worth saving, and the important issues DO include lack of medical care, abortion, faster adoptions.
Just because stats may indicate lower percentages on the abortion issue vs the others, it doesn't mean abortion should be ok.
2007-11-25 02:51:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Your forgetting the basic GOP principle on this fight like hell for them before they are born, then after they are born, fight like hell for capital punishment.
Besides what makes a more disturbing (media friendly) picture? an aborted fetus or a diseased young child
You are right the Earth is way over crowded, we need to concentrate on those that are here first, then they can worry about the coming generations later.
2007-11-25 03:18:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Need to be more like the innocent
2007-11-25 02:49:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
your crazy
those unwanted fetuses are also loved and wanted kids... think about it! (maybe not loved and wanted by the bio mom) but loved and wanted by many!
2007-11-25 02:52:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by KittyCatFishApe 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
hillary-condi ticket
2007-11-26 06:04:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋