Elections - October 2007

She was clearly unprepared as she fluffed the answer & contradicted herself which left an opening for Edwards attack on what he claims is her "double talk". Will this take away some of her brownie points?

2007-10-30 16:45:43 · 22 answers · asked by The Wiz 7

2007-10-30 16:35:35 · 4 answers · asked by sonrisita 2

As president they will represent all americans if you can't speak to all americans you don't deserve my vote.

2007-10-30 16:21:46 · 25 answers · asked by ken s 5

Didnt you find it weird how Bill came out the blue defending Hillary in th debates..

2007-10-30 16:18:41 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I recently found out from my employer that all the sales staff on our team are to be terminated in 2 weeks, than offered new positions under a different award structure that eliminates a salary and is commission only ! So a month before Xmass I will have no income, as Real Estate is traditionally very slow over late December - mid January I don't see a rosy Xmass. After working long hours and generating a hundred qualified leads of people who will be selling in the near-mid term, with hundreds of thousands of $ in fees, eg average sale house is $2M and apartment sale about $550K AT 2% each sale I feel like telling this die hard Liberal spoilt Rich prck where to go along with the Liberal Party and take my contact list elsewhere and work to point him out of business ! Molly I can understand how you feel now !

2007-10-30 16:02:56 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-30 15:35:18 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Not who you like necessarily, but who would have the best chance. Let's just say she decided to stay home and bake cookies for Bill.

2007-10-30 15:34:42 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-30 15:24:03 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hey dems Obsess much?

2007-10-30 15:14:45 · 11 answers · asked by ken s 5

2007-10-30 14:57:59 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

...in the 2008 presidential election.
Are you going to help make history and vote for Hillary?

2007-10-30 14:01:12 · 15 answers · asked by *LiLy* 4

2007-10-30 13:46:25 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Oh, and feel free to relate any stories of how friendly & effeciently your last visit to the DMV or ANY government run agency was for you. Please?

2007-10-30 13:34:22 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-30 12:56:37 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I would

Libs (even those dressed up as Perot ah... I mean Ron Paul supporters) - Please do not answer.

2007-10-30 12:48:41 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-30 12:42:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-30 12:33:35 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

I don't know any myself. Places of employment offer insurance and cover most of the cost.

2007-10-30 11:18:43 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

...like gravity, cell theory, evolution, molecular orbital theory, germ theory, etc, etc

2007-10-30 11:08:49 · 8 answers · asked by Take it from Toby 7

Issues he stands for, when he entered the race, your predictions on the outcome of the primaries...etc.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!

2007-10-30 09:56:34 · 7 answers · asked by Marla 3

Don't any of the Republican candidates have a better plan than continuing Bush's losing strategy in Iraq? Surely there's a better way to protect ourselves than flushing money down the toilet in Iraq!

2007-10-30 09:51:36 · 21 answers · asked by rj 2

Other than because she is a woman please...
What specific plans does she have that you support?

2007-10-30 09:51:00 · 23 answers · asked by needliberty 2

What does it stand for?
Clinton's
Harm
All
--Negroes
--Geeks
--Everyone!

2007-10-30 09:13:34 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-30 08:51:38 · 1 answers · asked by R J 7

If they are soooooo good - which people seem to think - but have they really thought? - I thought the general ruling was if a thing is good it will stand alone - what labour is doing is school yard tactics - trying to be brave and good by being a bully - so to all labour - stop bagging the next party and start proving you are worth my vote by showing a positive attitude - at the moment i doubt you would even know what the word means!!!

2007-10-30 08:39:31 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

How would you respond to a person who told you that they were not going to register to vote because one vote does not matter??

2007-10-30 08:31:38 · 22 answers · asked by A.k. 3

Zogby: Majority Favor Strikes on Iran

Monday, October 29, 2007 9:47 PM

Article Font Size




A majority of likely voters - 52 percent - would support a U.S. military strike to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon, and 53 percent believe it is likely that the U.S. will be involved in a military strike against Iran before the next presidential election, a new Zogby America telephone poll shows.


The survey results come at a time of increasing U.S. scrutiny of Iran. According to reports from the Associated Press, earlier this month Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice accused Iran of "lying" about the aim of its nuclear program and Vice President Dick Cheney has raised the prospect of "serious consequences" if the U.S. were to discover Iran was attempting to devolop a nuclear weapon. Last week, the Bush administration also announced new sanctions against Iran.


Democrats (63 percent) are most likely to believe a U.S. military strike against Iran could take place in the relatively near future, but independents (51 percent) and Republicans (44 percent) are less likely to agree. Republicans, however, are much more likely to be supportive of a strike (71 percent), than Democrats (41 percent) or independents (44 percent). Younger likely voters are more likely than those who are older to say a strike is likely to happen before the election and women (58 percent) are more likely than men (48 percent) to say the same – but there is little difference in support for a U.S. strike against Iran among these groups.


When asked which presidential candidate would be best equipped to deal with Iran – regardless of whether or not they expected the U.S. to attack Iran – 21 percent would most like to see New York U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton leading the country, while 15 percent would prefer former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani and 14 percent would want Arizona U.S. Sen. John McCain in charge. Another 10 percent said Illinois Sen. Barack Obama would be best equipped to deal with Iran, while Republican Fred Thompson (5 percent), Democrat John Edwards (4 percent) and Republican Mitt Romney (3 percent) were less likely to be viewed as the best leaders to help the U.S. deal with Iran. The telephone poll of 1,028 likely voters nationwide was conducted Oct. 24-27, 2007 and carries a margin of error of +/- 3.1 percentage points.


Clinton leads strongly among Democrats on the issue, with 35 percent saying she is best equipped to deal with Iran, while 17 percent would prefer Obama and 7 percent view John Edwards as the best choice. Giuliani is the top choice of Republicans (28 percent), followed by McCain (21 percent) and Fred Thompson (9 percent). One in five independents chose Clinton (21 percent) over McCain (16 percent) and Giuliani (11 percent). Clinton was the top choice among women (24 percent), while 14 percent would be more confident with Giuliani in the White House and 11 percent would prefer McCain. Men slightly prefer McCain (18 percent) to Clinton (17 percent) on this issue, while 15 percent said Giuliani is best equipped to deal with Iran. The survey also shows there is a significant amount of uncertainty if any of the long list of declared candidates would be best equipped to deal the Iran – 19 percent overall said they weren’t sure which candidate to choose.


There is considerable division about when a strike on Iran should take place – if at all. Twenty-eight percent believe the U.S. should wait to strike until after the next president is in office while 23 percent would favor a strike before the end of President Bush’s term. Another 29 percent said the U.S. should not attack Iran, and 20 percent were unsure. The view that Iran should not be attacked by the U.S. is strongest among Democrats (37 percent) and independents, but fewer than half as many Republicans (15 percent) feel the same. But Republicans are also more likely to be uncertain on the issue (28 percent).


As the possibility the U.S. my strike Iran captures headlines around the world, many have given thought to the possibility of an attack at home. Two in three (68 percent) believe it is likely that the U.S. will suffer another significant terrorist attack on U.S. soil comparable to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 – of those, 27 percent believe such an attack is very likely. Nearly one in three (31 percent) believe the next significant attack will occur between one and three years from now, 22 percent said they believe the next attack is between three and five years away, and 15 percent said they don’t think the U.S. will be attacked on U.S. soil for at least five years or longer. Just 9 percent believe a significant terrorist attack will take place in the U.S. before the next presidential election.

2007-10-30 07:53:01 · 16 answers · asked by Lejeune42 5

Why are republicans so pompus. Not all, some are normal people, but most are not..

Grand Old Party, give me a break..

Dems are no better..

2007-10-30 07:49:31 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-30 04:55:12 · 31 answers · asked by Lioness 6

Pretty comprehensive.. click the link to see the results.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_polls_for_the_Republican_Party_%28United_States%29_presidential_nomination%2C_2008

2007-10-30 04:33:48 · 6 answers · asked by Think Richly™ 5