I think you would have to be a damn fool to limit yourself by saying ... "I am only going to vote Republican" or "I am only going to vote Democrat". The sooner people figure out that both parties are the same, the better. Both are equally corrupt, and both say whatever they need to say in order to get elected. We need to break away from the mindset of voting strictly based off of party affiliations.
People need to start doing the research, learn about all the candidates, what they believe and say, and make an educated vote after that.
That being said, you'd have to be a fool to vote for Hillary Clinton ... if you actually stopped to listen to what she says, and what she promises, you would know that she is doing/saying whatever it takes to get elected. If you want to vote Democrat, thats fine, just vote for Obama. He seems to be one of the more honest candidates to me.
Also, when did Hillary become so religious? To win votes maybe?
2007-10-30 14:12:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Taylor - 2
·
3⤊
5⤋
Anyone who would vote for Hillary is either blind or going through life with blinders on. Hillary Clinton is the single most corrupt politician that ever ran for office. The fact that she is the front runner speaks volumes for the ignorance of the American public. She is a liar who will say what ever it is to get elected. PERIOD. She is a disgrace.
2007-10-30 14:59:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by GSmooth 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't vote Hillary for dog catcher. I am on the verge of starting a business, however, I'm waiting for the outcome of the election. If she is elected, I'm going to have to hold off on any monetary decisions, of that magnitude for some time. I'd really have to wait at least a year or two until she's out of office for things to get back to right.
The only way I would go ahead and get the ball rolling any sooner, is if the Republicans take back the house and senate, that way I would be assured any of her economic plans wouldn't come to pass.
2007-10-30 14:11:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by damond h 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Ron Paul is the only person worth voting for.
Edit: Nice try on the Ron Paul racist thing. As you and the article forget to mention, this was written by someone else writing for the magazine. With this being said, Ron Paul fired the man in question, apologized, and accepted the blame, as he freely admits he should have read what people were trying to publish in a publication in his name.
As far as the Israeli government goes, the following article backs him up. And please explain why a foreign government should have any lobby or influence at all in American anything, much less foreign policy. Exactly what our founding fathers warned against, and put the natural born citizen for President clause for.
The article:http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=23083
2007-10-30 14:36:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by bacco l 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not me..
I commend all Americans who are trying to learn more about the candidates before the 2008 election. In my opinion, an uniformed voter is down right dangerous. I am supporting the Republican Ticket for their stance on Foreign Policy. I do not believe that the ticket will lead with Rudy, Mitt or Ron Paul and this is why….
Strike Rudy - He is responsible for nixing the Line Item Veto, pro-abortion, he spends to much! Check his record!
Strike Mitt - He is trying to sell us on the fact that he is Ronald Reagan's Clone which is so not-true. Blames his MA record on him having to work in a Liberal State, He is a FRAUD and McCain called him on it in the 10/21/07 debate!
Strike Ron Paul - He is not really a Republican, has no clue on foreign policy and is likely a racist. See the web-site below.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1835179/posts
Hillary Supporters Please read this!
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AltCYoWQJyiRh9CwPYjMrdLsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071027105509AAcWJ0b or go right to the source @
http://www.gop.com/Blog/Default.aspx
http://www.ontheissues.org/2004_GOP_Platform.htm Republican – McCain, Huckabee, Thompson
http://gopplatform08.blogspot.com/2007/05/grassroots-conservative-republican.html?gclid=CMKKzLm9t48CFQ2aOAodAlZFdg
http://www.fff.org/freedom/0301f.asp Libertarian – Ron Paul
http://www.ontheissues.org/Dem_Platform_2004.htm - Democrat - Hillary, Obama
Good Question! Thanks for asking....
2007-10-30 14:54:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
They told me I could get a drivers license and also vote because the mayor of New York was going to set it, but now the racist New Yorkers have stopped that so I guess I will just have to wait until Hillary gets in and makes me legal. Hasta luego.
2007-10-30 14:35:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by R J 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
I'm going to vote Ron Paul. Firstly, he is a very honest person. Secondly, he is not running for president because he would enjoy the power, he is running because he cares deeply about our freedoms and our constitution. If anyone has heard his speeches I think they would agree on that point. I don't want to vote for someone to make history (Obama/Clinton). I want to vote for some one to make a difference and who is a genuine messenger of peace and freedom.
I was not planning to vote but after realizing that Ron Paul is an honest member of congress I feel a sense of duty to cast my vote this election.
2007-10-30 14:06:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Citizen80285bnz 2
·
4⤊
3⤋
I am not voting for Hillary because of the history I would help create. Turning America into a weak taxful country.
2007-10-30 14:09:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by I'm Chris Hansen 7
·
3⤊
5⤋
Ron Paul.
2007-10-30 14:34:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
no I'm going to make history and vote for Ron Paul
lets make it the year the citizens took back government.
2007-10-30 14:11:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋