Current Events - October 2007

New World Order (Novus Ordo Mundi) refers to a conspiracy theory in which a powerful and secretive group is to be conspiring to eventually rule the world via an autonomous world government, which would replace sovereign states and other checks and balances in world power struggles. In new world order conspiracy theories, many significant occurrences are caused by a powerful secret group. Historical and current events are seen as steps in an on-going plot to rule the world primarily through a combination of political finance, social engineering, mind control[citation needed], and fear-based propaganda, in addition to alleged mass genocides of Christian sects[citation needed]. One of its early mentions was in the 1975 Gerald Ford's "Declaration of Interdependence" as recorded by historian Henry Steele Commager which states that: "we must join with others to bring forth a new world order....Narrow notions of national sovereignty must not be permitted to curtail that obligation" many also believe the war on terror is the platform for the new world order, as it was exactly ten years after George H. W. Bush spoke about the new world order on live television.

2007-10-10 13:53:27 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Israel deny having nuclear weapons but the rest of the world says that they do.
Who's right?

2007-10-10 13:37:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

But it is stated on teletext that a child in Britain goes missing every five minutes and one hundred thousand disappear in a year. We never hear about all of these children, why is the McCanns case so different.

2007-10-10 13:26:19 · 16 answers · asked by Kirks Folley 5

my heart goes out to all afeected by this latest shooting. i live in sydney australia and my prayers and thoughts are with you all. how much more can the usa take.

2007-10-10 12:16:20 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

I DO 100%!

I DONT WANT THAT UGLY PIECE OF DOG FECES!(FREEDOM TOWER)

2007-10-10 12:04:33 · 3 answers · asked by I Love Twilight! 3

until the results of the forensic tests on the hair are made public before they decide whether or not to sue. If the tests can't show that Madeleine was sedated they will go ahead and sue. As it is, they don't know which way the ball will fall so they are waiting on their desicion. Otherwise, why the delay. If they knew for a fact that they hadn't drugged the children they wouldn't just be threatening to sue, they would have done it a long time ago. There is no reason not to sue immediately if they know for sure that they didn't sedate the children.

2007-10-10 11:05:39 · 27 answers · asked by trancebabe 4

there is something very wrong going on here. i know that i am not the only person seeing this behavior as a serious problem. these people who are doing these malicious crimes need to stop hiding and be true to who they are and what they stand for. i hate cowards!

2007-10-10 10:58:07 · 7 answers · asked by blaquequeen71 2

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/somerset/7038233.stm

2007-10-10 10:24:04 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Damn! Back in my day, those that got picked only DREAMED about killing their tormentors (real or imagined)...what is it with these kids nowadays? Is it that weapons are more easily available? I don't think so...

Have 90's kids been raised so politically-correct that they didn't learn any tough-love lessons?

Or are they just pansies?

2007-10-10 10:22:57 · 6 answers · asked by a kinder, gentler me 7

I dont really get the question, my teacher assigned that for homework and I am not sure how to answer it. He was asking us why some people give up some of their freedom for security why cant we be secure and have freedom..

2007-10-10 10:00:06 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

It's terrible. What is with all these kids? I think one thing is that parents give their kids guns when they're young.

2007-10-10 09:53:01 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-10 09:24:15 · 4 answers · asked by n_money 1

do you know that abunch of (black water) agents killed
innocent people children and women in iraq,

2007-10-10 09:19:41 · 9 answers · asked by FRANK SINATRA 2

Then no one would Fcuk with Britain

2007-10-10 09:01:54 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-10 08:39:34 · 36 answers · asked by 17pdr 4

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/07/wiran307.xml

2007-10-10 07:39:15 · 1 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1

What do you think?

2007-10-10 06:49:43 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Israel had a VERY STRONG military, and more than enough Nukes.. So why does America have to get involved. Iran is not a threat to the US, same as Iraq.

2007-10-10 06:40:11 · 9 answers · asked by whoever 2

Before he was executed, would you have supported putting Saddam back in power, rebuilding his military, and letting him go on doing what he was doing?
Then please let me know what business we had in Europe in the 1940’s. Japan attacked us, not Germany. Hitler had not yet done anything to us directly, and we had declared a neutral stance. Whats the difference?

2007-10-10 05:00:16 · 6 answers · asked by rayb1214 7

Anybody got any ideas of why it has been in the 90's during October?

2007-10-10 04:47:27 · 7 answers · asked by Yahoo Sucks 5

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,300686,00.html

Why would George Bush interject himself in this situation other than to ensure this piece of filth is put to death. George Bush has turned his back on conservatives and for most part the American people by his refusal to address the imigration emergency this country is facing.

2007-10-10 04:36:42 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is a current event for me because today is trash day.

As our bin is dumped in the truck, the “sanitation technician” eyeballs what’s being dumped. Obvious things verboten like car tires or computer monitors, I suppose would be pulled back.

Well it occurred to me that if someone was dumpster-diving, wouldn’t they be more likely to take a bag of shredded paper than a bag of chicken bones and coffee grounds? Isn't more attention directed at the things we're seemingly hiding?

Are we making ourselves more vulnerable by shredding?

2007-10-10 03:07:09 · 8 answers · asked by DeeDee Cortez 2

as an Englishman who owns many major US based companies I feel I am in a position to ask this.
The Americans that I own are very naive and they are being lied to their own government.In recent wars including Iraq US have been branded the worst army for their terrible record of shooting so many of their allies,
I have a theory which could show the US government as liars.It is as follows
The US government need to keep expenditure of weapons to a minimum , so i believe the US are purchasing their guns and rifles from ex fairground owners.The guns are the same guns that were used at fairs to win prizes.The thing which the US government has not taken into account is that fairground owners have bent the barrells of the guns and rifles to prevent prizes being won on a regular basis.These guns are then given to US soldiers who are "none the wiser" and then they shoot the wrong people.
Anyone agree?

2007-10-10 02:04:46 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-10 01:59:00 · 20 answers · asked by Ginny Jin 7

Not leading any direction, just wondering what people think? She's mentioned China and now Myanmar.

2007-10-10 01:40:22 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

where can i find the whole story on 'gine 6 trial?'

2007-10-10 01:36:09 · 3 answers · asked by I DONT CARE 4

i got some about half an hour ago,first mail in while, has anyone else

2007-10-10 01:34:37 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.kpho.com/news/14304861/detail.html

I do hope they take safety measures to prevent this in the future. I would be to scared to take my kids to the Grand Canyon. You would really have to glue them to you. Is there anyone here that has been there? Are their not fences up all around it?

2007-10-10 01:26:46 · 13 answers · asked by Ladybugs77 6

as an Englishman who owns many major US based companies I feel I am in a position to ask this.
The Americans that I own are often confused and feel they are being lied to by their own government In recent wars including Iraq, US soldiers have been branded the worst army for their terrible record of shooting friend and not foe.
I have a theory on this which could blow into a major scandal for the US governemnt .It is as follows
The US governemnt needs to keep the expenditure on weapons to a minimum, so i believe the US are purchasing their guns and rifles from ex fairground owners.The guns that were previously used by fairgrounds to win a prize.The thing which the US governement have not taken into account is that these fairground owners have bent the barrells of the guns and rifles to prevent prizes being won on a regular basis.These guns are then given to US soldiers who therefore have difficulty aiming at the right thing.
As you can see it all is starting to make sense

2007-10-10 01:24:50 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-10 01:12:42 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous