Global Warming

Who is embezzeling all of the gate money?

2007-07-12 05:41:43 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-12 04:54:25 · 27 answers · asked by kevin s 6

2007-07-12 04:51:50 · 2 answers · asked by stephendouglas81 1

as long as they are not willing to implement the best way to stop our CO2 emissions?
Does anyone know the best way? This is a test.

2007-07-12 04:25:51 · 12 answers · asked by areallthenamestaken 4

Very much as it didn't suit dinosaurs millions of years ago when they became extinct?

I am not sure we are so influential we can change environment amazingly over a period of a couple of 100 years of destruction........

2007-07-12 04:09:37 · 15 answers · asked by Saucy B 6

The middle ages warm period had global temps of 5-8 degrees warmer than today and none of the dire prediction occured then, in fact the people thrived at that time and the problems happened upon the cooling with the mini ice age which lasted untill the middle of the 19th century why do people believe all the doom and gloom predictions put forth by gore? History shows those predictions to be groundless.

2007-07-12 03:16:11 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

is global warming caused by human co2 emmissions?or is it just a cyclic position of our world??

2007-07-12 02:57:35 · 25 answers · asked by wallykins 1

Gazpacho, why do I want this link?

http://www2b.abc.net.au/tmb/Client/Board.aspx?b=89

I am trying to work and avoid forums/ answering questions.

2007-07-12 02:48:44 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-12 02:38:52 · 5 answers · asked by prettyinpinkgurl 1

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07193/801165-113.stm

if global warming continues, northeastern states will lose the brook trout, snow, snow-mobiling, sledding, skiing, snowboarding, ice-fishing, and all winter activities. I don't know about you, but I live for winter and want to do something. Do it for ourselves and our future generations.

2007-07-12 02:16:51 · 12 answers · asked by thinkGREEN 3

2007-07-12 01:57:04 · 11 answers · asked by bollampalli a 2

2007-07-12 01:52:18 · 12 answers · asked by the atomic penguin 2

i understand the fairness doctrine will effectively silence rush limbaugh, hannity and all the others who speak out against it..should we do this?

2007-07-12 00:39:52 · 19 answers · asked by federalistcapers 2

2007-07-11 22:10:45 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

are they serious? I mean, c'mon how can they not believe in it?

2007-07-11 14:33:50 · 23 answers · asked by Juan R 1

Face it, California expects 22 million more people in 50 years. If that is an expected percentage worldwide it wont make a bit of difference if we do not use cars or other power sources. I can see a host of other issues happening on top of warming if people are the cause. The only way to stop this is by controlling population.

2007-07-11 14:02:08 · 18 answers · asked by Paul K 1

The scientific case for anthropogenic global warming is now well-established, as is the possibility of great danger to the entire Earth and the future of humankind. As a scientist, I consider this series of articles in New Scientist magazine to be a fair treatment:

http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn11462

Despite the clear warning issued by the vast majority of climate scientists, there continue to be many skeptical voices on these pages. Clearly, the skeptical voices tap into many well-established conservative ideas: distrust of government, of collective international action, and of science. Yet the persistance, and illogical viciousness of the arguments seems out of proportion. I wonder, therefore, if there is some driving motivation. Cui bono? I suggest it is those who would most be harmed by the solution to global warming: the petrol states of Saudi Arabia, Iran, Venezuela, and Nigeria, with the complicity of the American petroleum industry.

2007-07-11 11:56:03 · 11 answers · asked by cosmo 7

i.e every 10,000 yrs our climate goes through changes

2007-07-11 11:49:17 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

there is evidence that romans used to grow wine grapes in southern britain, and in some places around the coast that used to be accesible by boat that are now miles inland. maybe this is supposed to happen every so many years?

2007-07-11 09:52:48 · 22 answers · asked by shocked 1

any tips to help me?

2007-07-11 09:43:28 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

It's not volcanoes. It's not water vapor. It's not carbonation in soda pop.

And it's not the sun or cosmic rays, either:

"This should settle the debate," said Mike Lockwood, from the UK's Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory, who carried out the new analysis together with Claus Froehlich from the World Radiation Center in Switzerland.

Dr Lockwood initiated the study partially in response to the TV documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle, broadcast on Britain's Channel Four earlier this year, which featured the cosmic ray hypothesis.

"All the graphs they showed stopped in about 1980, and I knew why, because things diverged after that," he told the BBC News website.

"You can't just ignore bits of data that you don't like," he said.

"Mike Lockwood's analysis appears to have put a large, probably fatal nail in this intriguing and elegant [cosmic ray] hypothesis."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6290228.stm

Do GW deniers have any alternative explanations left?

2007-07-11 08:33:38 · 11 answers · asked by Dana1981 7

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6290228.stm

2007-07-11 08:23:25 · 20 answers · asked by johninmelb 4

Cows, according to this news item, belch over 70 cubic liters of gas a day contributing significantly to Global Warming.

2007-07-11 08:11:23 · 12 answers · asked by Freesumpin 7

Live Earth was cute and all, but it did nothing but raise millions of dollars. Lots of people contributed lots to land fills, 250,000 air miles were traveled, countless car miles, etc. All which helped the environment I am sure. Out of all of this nobody suggested anything realistic we should be doing. Car exhaust bad? Agreed. Flying bad? ok. Recycling? Good idea. But nobody is going to stop driving, stop flying or stop even recycling tomorrow.

I'd like to see the big celebs and musicians, politicians, etc. give up there mansions, private jets, etc. and lead by example. Then maybe I will think about parking my SUV which all I do with it is drive to work, paying 3 bucks a gallon for gas, to feed my family. To get some left overs after the big corporations have taken everything. I won't make any big lifestyle changes, I can't afford to.

Tell me what I can do now that's free to reverse climate change which by every scientists own account, can not be reversed?

2007-07-11 08:03:51 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

i was just researching this,and i found out that the U.S. government was thinking of different ways to dispose of nuclear waste.one of them was that they could launch it into space.another was that they could just simply put it into metal barrels with heating elements,and put them in antartica,and wait for them to melt through to the rocksheets many miles down. also,yet another one was to bury the in salt,and wait for the salt to crystalise and soon plasticise ove the barrels...does anybody else think this is unethical and WRONG.because no matter where we put them,somebody in some other future time WILL find them,no matter how hard we hide them.so,is it just me,or do other people care about disposal of nuclear waste???

2007-07-11 07:44:05 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-11 07:03:31 · 14 answers · asked by Gina P 2

agree?

2007-07-11 05:26:13 · 16 answers · asked by Mr. Blue 4

i read on yahoo new yesterday about San franciso is trying to stop selling bottle water and drink tap water instead. it said something about the bottles and global warmming. I dont under stand. please exspale to me.♥

2007-07-11 04:52:19 · 12 answers · asked by violetrosebudd 2

...do u think it is really happening or whatever your thoughts are just write them down.

2007-07-11 04:28:21 · 17 answers · asked by Ireadtoomuch 2

2007-07-11 04:27:25 · 8 answers · asked by christine2550@sbcglobal.net 2