Hi,
I'm writing a movie review for Thank You for Smoking. I read the plot outline on Wikipedia and I really liked it. So I changed the summary I wrote to be more it. First I'll give you what I have written, and then their's.
Will you tell me if they are different enough to not be considered plagerism? Or if I still need to make some changes.
Here's my summary:
Nick Naylor is the chief spokesman and Vice President of the Academy of Tobacco Studies, a lobby created and funded by cigarette companies to "research" the links between smoking cigarettes and health. Obviously, no links are ever found. His job is to "inform" the public of these results, as well as defend the rights of smokers.
Each week, Nick meets with Bobby Jay Bliss and Polly Bailey, the lobbyists for the gun and alcohol lobbies, collectively self-referred to as the M.O.D. Squad (or Merchants Of Death) for lunch to discuss the new problems they come against.
2006-11-30
07:17:04
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Famous Amos {not the cookies}
5