English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Philosophy - March 2007

[Selected]: All categories Arts & Humanities Philosophy

2007-03-15 23:26:04 · 16 answers · asked by JarJar Odd 2

2007-03-15 23:22:33 · 11 answers · asked by martin 1

2007-03-15 23:08:03 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-15 22:28:40 · 3 answers · asked by Turiya 1

parents and people say that people who get good marks in school are very intelligent and genius but they say students getting poor marks are fools and they are fit for nothing.do u think people who get good marks are brilliant and people who don't get marks are fools

2007-03-15 22:28:15 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why do even the most beautiful ones feel insecure about their looks? Why do even the most intelligent make foolish relationship choices? Why don't we realize that we don't need men at all, that they are only anchors around our necks? Why don't we stand up & demand better? Why don't we realize our own strength?

(Ok, this is obviously a generalization. There are many powerful women who celebrate their unique beauty & don't criticize themselves or obsess over flaws, who have healthy loving relationships or who live independently, happy without men, women with conviction, women aware of their own power -- but I'm referring to the rest of us...)

I've had a bad day...
Can you tell?!
:)
Girl power!

2007-03-15 22:16:49 · 27 answers · asked by amp 6

an atheist often suggests that the existence of evil entails the nonexistence of God. For, he argues, if God exists, then being omniscient, he knows under what circumstances evil will occur, if he does not act; and being omnipotent, he is able to prevent its occurrence. Hence, being perfectly good, he will prevent its occurrence and so evil will not exist. Hence the existence of God entails the nonexistence of evil.

2007-03-15 22:00:05 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

give me a reason why money not ensure happiness in life??

2007-03-15 21:51:16 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Let's say you once loved someone. Then something happened, and you broke up, divorced, he/she died, whatever. A few years down the line, you suddenly realized that the person was actually the love of your life (how you came to this conclusion is up to your imagination, assuming that there is only one true love per person per life). What would you do? Would you try loving again, even though you know you'll never find true love again?

2007-03-15 21:48:48 · 12 answers · asked by shaunarthur 2

a need help from you.can you find the point of this topic???

2007-03-15 21:35:51 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

can you find the point of this topic???

2007-03-15 21:30:31 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-15 21:28:50 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Follow your Innate Heart with complete vigour or obey the outward compulsions or a controlled and balanced approach of compromising few things for a few other things ?

2007-03-15 21:25:28 · 5 answers · asked by Indra 2

what are the flaws in:

dualism

empericism

nihilism

realism

existenstialism

2007-03-15 21:11:46 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-15 21:08:48 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

perhaps he was not the right guy

2007-03-15 21:08:07 · 11 answers · asked by lonely 1

2007-03-15 20:48:23 · 7 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

that creator and destroyer is GOD!!!

2007-03-15 20:40:36 · 8 answers · asked by glomariza 1

I asked the question a little while ago of 'what would the future think of us?' We llok back and find the way that they did thing to be stupid, unhealthy and nearsighted.

The tone of the answers that I got was that the future would see us as we see the past, nearsighted, stupid and barbarick.

So my question is, If we are in the very special position to know how the future will regard us, Why don't we do something to change it now?

Why don't we try to make look of our history better than what it would if left to itself?

Thanks.

2007-03-15 20:09:02 · 9 answers · asked by Arthur N 4

This tries to question the common perception that change is the only thing constant in this world... If this perception were true, why were the fundamental laws of nature applicable right from the beginning of time... aren't they also constants to begin with? Basically, I think that change is a concept introduced by man because he doesn't have the capability to full grasp the cycles that happen in the earth... For example, the life cycle of humans... Viewed by phases - adolescence, puberty, adulthood - they all represent the changes that a human undergoes... But viewed from its totality, they are actually constants in the equation called human life... So maybe, change is not really as constant as we see it today... Despite the fact that some of these changes, are dramatic, they may actually be constants, in some equation which we have no capability of understanding nor comprehending yet! This question is basically to get the general perception of Yahoo people, so pls ans respnsbly...

2007-03-15 20:00:23 · 8 answers · asked by windsinger 2

2007-03-15 19:42:12 · 7 answers · asked by martin 1

Seriously. Why are so many of them so insensitive? Is it the testosterone? Is it that they just don't have the same emotional capacity as women or is it because they're socialized to stifle or deny their feelings?

Sorry guys, it was a bad day for your gender...or rather, for me where they're concerned...

2007-03-15 19:27:55 · 32 answers · asked by amp 6

2007-03-15 19:24:38 · 11 answers · asked by martin 1

I mean in comparison to the whole universe..we are "nothing", so my question is what are we doing here? what is our purpose of even existing on Earth among other galaxies of the universe? why are we here???

2007-03-15 19:05:47 · 22 answers · asked by Forza Inter_09 2

He thinks that we are not rationally justified in believing in one...but does he think one exists?

2007-03-15 19:04:02 · 3 answers · asked by mcgilllilnancy 2

fedest.com, questions and answers