Philosophy - January 2007

2007-01-09 03:49:48 · 4 answers · asked by Kgs 4

2007-01-09 03:48:44 · 3 answers · asked by nachomanhulk 1

2007-01-09 03:44:21 · 16 answers · asked by mntrek 2

what would you change? It has to be something you have done personally (or not done maybe?)

2007-01-09 03:43:51 · 37 answers · asked by Georgie 5

I think we are close...what do you think???

2007-01-09 03:31:26 · 18 answers · asked by mick271602 2

2007-01-09 03:30:11 · 41 answers · asked by mick271602 2

what will the future world could remember? your saying in history! tell me... no joking, no kidding, no offence, no spam... plz!

2007-01-09 03:28:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-09 03:02:00 · 21 answers · asked by Flower Power 2

I found these books on a yahoo answers. They are examaples of pre-logicality. Demonstrating that western science and mathemastics are pre-logical in the levi -Buhl sense. They argue that if logic is an epistemic condition of truth then logic demonstrates that mathematics and scvience are self-contradictory or meaningless. In other words in terms of the logic these discipline use as the criteria of truth there own criteria collaspes them into meaninglessness. Some wil say that so what maths and science work. Yes but the author argues this just makes how they work more of a mystery since if logic is a tool for truth this very tool demonstrates they canont be "true" as they are self contradictorory WHAT DO YOU THINK.. The author uses these case studies to argue all human thinking and products of thought entail meaninglessness or pre-logicality if logic is an epistemic condition of truth

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/gamahucher_press_catalogue.htm

2007-01-09 02:58:24 · 1 answers · asked by ann 1

2007-01-09 02:57:32 · 15 answers · asked by ruby 2

I know I know very featured question like but still...=) ...what do you think is the answer to all the suffering that takes place in our world...

2007-01-09 02:53:02 · 15 answers · asked by Fia 5

2007-01-09 02:33:48 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-09 02:29:02 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-09 02:16:42 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-09 02:12:02 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-09 01:49:39 · 14 answers · asked by x 2

2007-01-09 01:45:37 · 33 answers · asked by x 2

"In natura, nimic nu este contingent,ci toate sunt determinate sa existe si sa actioneze intr_un anumit fel,din necesitatea naturii lui Dumnezeu.
Un lucru care este determinat sa faca ceva a fost determinat in chip necesar de Dumnezeu;iar lucrul care nu este determinat de Dumnezeu nu se poate determina de la sine actiune.
Cu cat stiinta noastra ca totul e necesar se refera mai mult la lucrurile individuale pe acre ni le reprezentam mai clar si mai viu,cu atat este mai mare puterea sufletului."

2007-01-09 01:17:12 · 3 answers · asked by emma 1

2007-01-09 00:52:26 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=85936617&blogID=215094355&MyToken=a8ac90a7-bad4-40a2-8eec-80eb6f27303a

2007-01-09 00:45:20 · 6 answers · asked by Analyst 7

What are some good ways to get revenge?

2007-01-09 00:28:06 · 45 answers · asked by brendanconnal 1

india

2007-01-09 00:27:31 · 17 answers · asked by senthilkumara g 1

2007-01-09 00:23:02 · 24 answers · asked by AgNe S 1

i heard this question from a radio and there is only 1 right answer to this question..so whoever give me the right answer earn 10 points? any body out there who had the right answer?

2007-01-09 00:22:43 · 13 answers · asked by Imaginarist... 1

Let's assume two persons...

One who has, let's say, on a scale from 1 to 10, had an IQ of 10 but had an experience of 5, we name him "John"...

The other who had an IQ of 5, but an experience of 10, we name him "Peter"...

On a general competition (any competition), who do you think would most likely win??

So, this is a battle between an intelligent and an experienced...

2007-01-09 00:21:09 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is marriage necessary? Is individual freedom compromised? Is it necessary so that the society would be sane and healthy? Is it necessary to ensure a healthy future generation? Is this why a married person is considered a more responsible, dependable and respectable member of the society?

2007-01-08 23:59:58 · 18 answers · asked by small 7

on the basis of behave.

2007-01-08 23:56:03 · 10 answers · asked by vishal v 1

i often hear people saying sh.it like
"ooh well i did (*insert deed here*) for so and so because i know itll come back to me eventually"

isnt the idea of karma kind of selfish?

2007-01-08 23:53:00 · 18 answers · asked by Meeowf 3

2007-01-08 23:12:07 · 11 answers · asked by Pawan S 1

I think he is a philosfor.

2007-01-08 23:08:54 · 4 answers · asked by sagiat 1