English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Philosophy - January 2007

[Selected]: All categories Arts & Humanities Philosophy

Is this revelations, where we become brother against brother etc., we are being torn apart by an internal disease that has manifested itself in the very heart of this great country. Is it this administration with all their hatred that has spred like wild fire? The 911 was tragic and immoral and practically unforgivable, but we must live on and smile and be positive, and start over. Are we going to end up in a civil war over this hatred that has fell upon this whole country? Or can we remedy this long enough to wait for a new administration? We all know that Bush had a vendetta before he took the white house by storm, and can't we just realize that there are some people who are selfish and use the things to their own advantages to start a war to control? Won't we be able to see through the fog? This is important we need not fear but we need to do something about all the feuding amongst ourselves? I think it is a plan to control us at our weakest, a world take over? What do you think?

2007-01-10 14:31:17 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Other than education, health, 8 hr job, house, car, family, friends, recreation time everyday, vacation and travel twice a year. Pretty standard stuff, and then if all is well for us, pass the extra buck to the next guy so all can enjoy it the same.

Can the highy advanced moon hopping Human Beings provide all this for the 8 or so billion people by 2099? What needs to be done to achieve this? Values? Politics? Economical Model? Technological Advancement? Ofcourse, we cannot achieve this if we do not what it?

2007-01-10 14:17:14 · 12 answers · asked by vinod s 4

or "waste", "burn", "spend" it? time is an idea that falls under "intangible" items. yet so many phrases make it sound like it's a physical item. why?

2007-01-10 13:45:31 · 22 answers · asked by drunken pumpkin 6

I dont believe in God, but i wanted to know if theres any good evidences, not nessisarily proof, that god dosent exist. Ive read some good stuff before, im trying to collect all the info i can. Ive got a bunch of stuff on how the bible contridicts itself. Anyone got other things? Such as secret dire truths or the pope doing some crazy **** or those such things? Btw, take ur "GOD IS REAL, UR GOING TO HELL" elsewhere, ill read right over that ignorant crap.

2007-01-10 13:44:12 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

provide your own example

2007-01-10 13:32:17 · 4 answers · asked by tmang0502 1

let me know the source...

2007-01-10 13:32:11 · 4 answers · asked by Jona 1

2007-01-10 13:22:41 · 7 answers · asked by j b 2

We all die alike. Which is the better one?

2007-01-10 13:21:21 · 9 answers · asked by Foster M 1

E.g. because she's a know-it-all, or it's fake, etc...

2007-01-10 13:14:18 · 24 answers · asked by kristinjenkins@rogers.com 2

2007-01-10 13:12:41 · 16 answers · asked by kristinjenkins@rogers.com 2

It is relevant in behavior of people and their biased opinions, I am curious do these people have joy in their lives? Or do they get that sick satisfaction from hatred? Do they thrive on the hatred? Is it an excuse for their pathetic existance?

2007-01-10 12:54:32 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

can u please tell me what can be a world's biggest lie?

2007-01-10 12:43:21 · 37 answers · asked by azad 1

We just have to ask the right questions.

2007-01-10 12:36:20 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

just wondering

2007-01-10 12:34:20 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-10 12:26:50 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-10 12:06:56 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

because that would kind of suck

2007-01-10 11:57:35 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Subordinate is 2 sentences joined together, right???With and but and that stuff????? And simple sentence is w/ only a verb and a noun? And I think one of those is when the sentence starts w/ some kind of word that maked in incomplete/?? Could someone please explain and give an example of these???

2007-01-10 11:56:51 · 1 answers · asked by smileyrylee 1

Apollonius of Tyana had studied about Lord Krishna in the Himalayas and then he returned and introduced these teachings to the Essenes, who became the first "Chrishn-ins", later Christians. The writings of Apollonius were re-written and plagurized by Roman churchmen at the Council of Nicea three centuries later.

In the fourth century, A.D., Hierocles accused the Christian priesthood of this plagury and of INVENTING a messiah by combining the name of the sun god, Iesus, with the name Chrishna, which had become corrupted to Christ by that time.

For example, in the birth story of both Lord Krishna and Jesus, the king ordered the death of all newborn male children. Also, both grew up as shepards, or cowherd boys.

The story of Jesus was plagurized from the life of Krishna.

I humbly request that all of the Christians out there study and compare the life of Krishna and Jesus, at the website below.

www.krsnabook.com/contents/

Questions? Email me at bhaktacaitanya@yahoo.com

2007-01-10 11:54:44 · 3 answers · asked by devotee 1

2007-01-10 10:48:00 · 5 answers · asked by kawaneee west-peterson 1

Me and my girlfriend had a discussion of what true sexual freedom might look like – as in, a hypothetical world where people could agree to be together, but are ok not owning each other, std’s and pregnancies are preventable, and paternity testing makes sure the right guys are raising the right babies – and we had some ideas about what it might look like.

We know that men want to have sex with lots of women to spread their seed far and wide, but women invest more in their offspring and therefore are selective. This makes women the chooser in the sexual game. However, women what different things at different times. I’ve read that ovulating women want square jaw, high testosterone hotties when they’re ovulating to give their children the strongest genes, but want a man with softer features who are more likely to stick around and be a good dad during the rest of her cycle. Studies show that women are pretty good at picking out between the two. And women are more likely to cheat during monogamous relationships.

In other monogamous animals, like birds, females do the same. They have flings with high testosterone, usually younger, males, but continuously mate with life partners that have every reason to assist in rearing the chicks since it’s a good likelihood they’re the dad.

So what if we were socialized to accept behavior more in tune with these instincts? We were ok that some men get many short term partners at some point in their lives, other men get to be super dads and get steady sex – and maybe a fling or two if they can pull it off - and women get both the mates and flings with no regrets?

Would it be good or bad? And if you can put yourself it such a world, is it good for the guys? Is it good for the girls? And how do you see yourself going about in such a world, and why?

2007-01-10 10:42:46 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Have you?

Did you put in practice? Nope? Why? Yeap? Why?

2007-01-10 10:26:05 · 5 answers · asked by . 1

key ideas and features off this time show progress and regreason what is your opinion!!!

2007-01-10 10:21:30 · 16 answers · asked by jason.gmathews 2

Our brains haven't evolved.
We have the same thinking processes that people did 3000 years ago. With all of our new information and advances in technology we are still no more wise than the people that believed the earth was flat.

All of Eastern philosophy, Greek philosophy, Judaism, Hinduism and Buddhism all existed before common era.

2007-01-10 10:19:15 · 4 answers · asked by DeanPonders 3

fedest.com, questions and answers