i am horrendously puzzled by this book, and i have to read it for AP US History extra credit.
i don't really understand this book, and although i know that the thesis is in the preface, i don't really know which sentence it is. is the thesis that the United states is not as much of a foregone conclusion as it is today? or is it that the tension between states rights and centralized federal power has never gone away since the very beginning, and that it is this tension that truly represents the federal intent?
although that there were voices back then urging prospective patriots to regard american independence as an early version of the manifest destiny, it was clearly unsuccessful. so, should people rule together and not have power concentrated on one place? thomas paine said that an island cannot rule a continent.
i am so puzzled.
please help!
thank you.
2007-11-04
09:27:42
·
1 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous