Well, to me is like a little disrespect on the death, taking him out and unveiled his remain to all. But I want hear/read you opinion about it..
2007-11-04 14:06:56 · 5 answers · asked by Äcorn (`.~) 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
It's not as disrespectful as you make it sound. His remains are treasured and preserved. Sure they are on display, but they are treated with care and respect. When you consider that not long ago mummies were burned as firewood, it's a huge improvement.
Like it or not, he is an important historical discovery. I'm just happy that he wasn't dissected twenty years ago.
2007-11-05 03:19:41 · answer #1 · answered by rohak1212 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The tomb and the mummy were deteriorating and needed to be preserved. The mummy is in an air tight case now and won't deteriorate any more. The tomb can be inspected and repaired without tourists trying to see to see the mummy inside. The mummy has been on display for decades in the tomb. He is simply on display in a safer environment now.
2007-11-04 15:10:50 · answer #2 · answered by old-bald-one 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i agree, i was shocked that he was so easily taken from his resting place and placed on exhibit with out any protests.
i think he should have been left where he was...it's disrespectful in so many ways, people these days have to respects or morals sometimes...i would hate to have this done to me
2007-11-04 14:12:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yeah i thought the same thing too. seemed odd that no one else brought it up, like on the news or something. i'm sure we broke some egyptian religious hex rule or something. if the world ends, i guess we'll know why.
2007-11-04 14:14:15 · answer #4 · answered by amklann 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's dead...he doesn't know nor does he care.
2007-11-04 15:05:11 · answer #5 · answered by Bill 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋