Does anyone know of any peer reviewed papers associated with the methodology of the PMOD corrections applied to the ACRIM composite?
Quite often AGW alarmists provide arguments from websites and blogs that indicate that PMOD is the more correct choice for a TSI dataset. Alternatively there are websites and blogs as well as peer reviewed literature that indicate PMOD is invalid, and any analysis or conclusions about climate drawn from PMOD might subsequently be invalid as well. Without peer reviewed literature supporting PMOD, it is hard to take the alamists opinion on PMOD seriously, when the data does not conform to what is known.
A website that supports ACRIM.
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/sppi_originals/the_unruly_sunne_cannot_be_ruled_out_as_a_cause_of_recent_climate_variation.html
A Peer reviewed paper that supports ACRIM.
http://www.acrim.com/Reference%20Files/Secular%20total%20solar%20irradiance%20trend%20during%20solar%20cycles%2021%E2%80%9323.pdf
.
.
2007-11-03
02:57:19
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Tomcat
5
in
Global Warming