This is really starting to get old. Look, here's all the data proving that the surface station data is reliable.
Here is a plot of the supposed "good" stations (red, CRN12), "bad" sations (green, CRN5), and GISS data, originally linked by EnragedParrot:
http://www.inturnsoftware.com/downloads/crn12_crn5_giss.gif
A discussion of surfacestations.org data and deception:
http://tamino.wordpress.com/2007/07/30/surface-stations/
A graph of surface and troposphere temperature measurements, the latter taken by satellite:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Satellite_Temperatures.png
And a discussion of the mistaken assumptions in questioning the surface station data courtesy of RealClimate:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/07/no-man-is-an-urban-heat-island/
The denier argument consists of - "look, this temperature station is next to a garbage can. That must be bad!"
Can the AGW doubters please drop this ridiculous argument now? It just undermines your position.
2007-11-02
18:14:34
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Dana1981
7
in
Global Warming