we learned well...and spread the knowledge openly...
2007-11-06 16:01:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You query is thoroughly backwards. Why are you asking the democrats that query whilst this is the previous republican administration that denied trials to suspected terrorists? The Dem's have been insisting that there be trials and the spectacular courtroom has an identical opinion. a armed forces courtroom the place the defendant isn't in a position to make certain the evidence against them isn't the form of trial the Germans and eastern had. They have been accepted to mount greater suitable than a token protection. BTW, why is it that lots of on the nicely suited insist that water boarding isn't torture whilst many of the pains of eastern pows you reference in touch fees of water boarding?
2016-10-03 05:44:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
OUR COUNTRY [THAT I LOVE] HAS A MAJOR CLUSTERFU##
ON THE FEDERAL LEVEL THAT IS BEST DESCRIBED AS A'' DO AS WE SAY NOT AS WE DO!''OUR DEMANDS OF OTHER COUNTRIES GOES WAY WAY DEEPER THAN CONTROLLED SIMULATED DROWNING TACTICS.
As for this second question ,imho ABSOLUTELY! its human nature.Based on a groups or a single persons motives choosing what is usefull then leaving the rest .For muslims to touch drugs in any way is a major sin.WHOS MAKING ALL THE SMACK THAT ENDS UP IN THE VIENS OF THE JUNKIES OF THE ENTIRE WORLD? MUSLIMS! Then they use the proceeds to kill even more of us, hence the motive.And books written and edited by man and revised over again thousands of years later put into hotel rooms night stands are completely pathetic foundations of how to live ones life.why? look at the majority of priests and what way of life they live! then they sweep it under the rug and make nuns homeless to pay for their crimes of violence.MOTIVE?CONTROL,&SATISFY FEELINGS OF LUST.wolves in sheeps clothing they are.
2007-11-05 10:19:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by usekungfu 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What's even worse is the way habeous corpus was just canned without any apparent protest from the American public. Do you realize that doing that nullifies the Bill of Rights? Any one of us could be subjected to this torture on the whim of dubya or any other government leader. You could just disappear off the face of the earth. It just might be safer in China.
2007-11-02 18:24:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Ive never heard one person condemn the nazis for physical pressure methods. What they were famous for was killing 6 million Jews and many in a grusome way.
We do pick and choose morality and I hope you choose to pick Jesus.
2007-11-02 18:30:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Torture is always a crime
2007-11-02 19:46:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by brainstorm 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's not okay for us to use any more than it was for the Nazis... it's the idiot politicians in charge of the country who think it's okay. That draws some parallels that some people aren't comfortable making.
2007-11-02 18:18:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rogue Scrapbooker 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
It's that lovely double standard that we've become so familiar with since the Shrub took control of the White House.
2007-11-02 18:19:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
1⤋
Because we're on the 'winning' side. That always determines who's right and who's wrong. Germany and Japan lost, and so they were in the wrong, simple as that. Doesn't make it right, though.
2007-11-02 18:23:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by nobody important 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
the current administration loves double standards
2007-11-02 18:37:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Salvador 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
It's not.
Besides it doesn't get them any where, ppl will start making up stuff, if they think it will stop the torture.
Not only is it cruel, it's also pointless.
2007-11-02 18:21:38
·
answer #11
·
answered by lilith 7
·
5⤊
0⤋