from this article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070917/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/mukasey_profile
The offending prose:
One of Mukasey's harshest critics said he, too, thought the former judge would be a good fit at the Justice Department — but for very different reasons.
"I think he'll make an excellent attorney general because now he can proceed unencumbered by any sense of fair play or impartiality," said Ron Kuby, an outspoken civil rights lawyer and radio host who is highly critical of government methods.
Kuby said there are things he likes about Mukasey. He suspects the judge opposes the death penalty, and called him "one of the brighter bulbs on the bench — he just used his incredible intelligence to distort the law."
Am I missing something, or does this barely make sense.
The judge is good because he is unencumbered by a sense of impartiality?!!!!! WOW: this=stupid!
The by line is an AP 'writer' Devlin Barrett. How do these guys keep their jobs..
2007-09-17
09:00:41
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Media & Journalism