Please, lets talk about Thomas Paine or Voltaire or Jefferson. At least those people had some logic and understanding of religion. I mean c'mon, you've had 2,000 years to disprove the New Testament and the best you can come up with is Dawkins? I much rather would have lived in the 1700s when people could at least pose a challenge to Christianity. Maybe I will subsitute the word "illogical" for "Dawkins", it would be a good euphemism I think."You are a very Dawkins person". Hmmm sounds good. Maybe I am just too hard on the man, maybe it is just his writing that is poor. Maybe he is much more logical in person. Jefferson was the exact opposite, you know, he wrote great but was a horrible speaker. Its a shame the Age of Englightenment ended, the debates back then would have been so much more interesting. Have any of you actually read Age of Reason? How could you possibly enjoy Dawkins after reading Age of Reason? Thats like going from Tolstoy to.... childrens pop-up books. C'mon.
2007-05-28
21:23:24
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality