http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/08/30/neighbor.stabbing.ap/index.html
A person posted a question about this story, what surprised me was that most people said that he got what he deserved for molesting a child. I've read the whole story and I haven't found anything that says that the supposed child molester indeed molested the child in question, only the childs testemony. The father of the child acted on anger and killed the man, but besided what the girl told her mom, no other evidence was found to suggest or pin the man with molesting the child, so why would people assume he did and say things like he got what he deserved. He wasn't a registered sex offender and didn't have anything connecting him with sex crimes against minors on his record besides a DUI, no evidence was presented to support the childs allegations, so how did he get what he deserved?
2006-08-31
04:39:21
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Fiesty Redhead
2
in
Politics