Cricket - July 2007

He is playing for Sussex against India. Why he is not playing for Pak.

2007-07-07 04:29:40 · 21 answers · asked by karikalan 7

2007-07-07 04:05:55 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

The selectors have announced a list of probables that have the seniors like Sachin, Ganguly & Dravid not in the list. They have opted out of the tournament to give chance to the youngsters to be chosen and perform for India. No doubt the seniors had the best intrest of India in mind when the did make the choise. They are all approaching 35 soon and Ganguly is already 35. Kumble 37 laxman approaching 33 are all on thier final lap of their illustrious career. Some like Sachin can never ever ever be replaced and is my personal favourite after Mohammed Azharuddin and Kapil.
Also the team to Africa for tour of Kenya and Zimbabwe have been chosen with Kaif as the captain of the team it is intresting to note that Kaif has also been chosen in the 20 20 squad where the present Indian captian is not there. Is this a sign of what the selectors are thinking?
What is your opinion on why the seniors have opted out and the thinking on the selection on Kaif as the captain of the team to Africa?

2007-07-07 00:59:39 · 18 answers · asked by Rej 2

ICC TEST CRICKET-2007

2007-07-07 00:22:57 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-06 23:53:54 · 18 answers · asked by vara 5 1

2007-07-06 23:34:06 · 20 answers · asked by Rajput 1

2007-07-06 22:07:27 · 20 answers · asked by Hi 2

2007-07-06 20:22:46 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

1.Rahul Dravid (India) Dum Hai
2.Shoaib Malik (Pakistan) Inchalah
3.Mahela Jayawardene (Sri Lanka) Cricket 07 champs
&
4.Mohammad Ashraful (Bangladesh) Sept 2001, at age 17 & 63 days, he became the youngest batsman to score a test hundred whe hit Lakan lions for 114....

2007-07-06 18:40:05 · 25 answers · asked by Furioso Lion88 5

Besides Dinesh Karthik, Yuvraj, Kaif, and Raina who are others in Team India that you consider reliable fielders?

2007-07-06 15:39:49 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-06 09:39:08 · 21 answers · asked by jonathan 2

2007-07-06 09:37:21 · 14 answers · asked by jonathan 2

2007-07-06 09:35:42 · 10 answers · asked by jonathan 2

2007-07-06 09:33:50 · 16 answers · asked by jonathan 2

2007-07-06 09:32:40 · 6 answers · asked by jonathan 2

cricket

2007-07-06 08:50:06 · 9 answers · asked by uraine m 1

West indies of 70s
Current australia
Don Bradmans australia

2007-07-06 08:26:46 · 15 answers · asked by utkarsh k 1

2007-07-06 05:30:16 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-06 02:20:23 · 7 answers · asked by ken p 5

If you listen to commentary while you watch. I've already named quite a few in my article, but really want to know whom you people like to listen..

http://www.itsonlycricket.com/entry/476/

2007-07-05 23:54:08 · 19 answers · asked by Binit. 1

2007-07-05 23:52:15 · 45 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-05 22:06:29 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-05 20:10:41 · 16 answers · asked by Thamara 3

Gichrist & Hayden
Jayasuriya & Tharanga
Sehwag & Ganguly
Chris Gaye & Chandrapaul
Grame Smith & AB Devillers

2007-07-05 20:09:58 · 25 answers · asked by Thamara 3

reply me at karansoni2004@yahoo.co.in

2007-07-05 20:07:27 · 12 answers · asked by karansoni2004 1

ok

2007-07-05 19:42:27 · 5 answers · asked by azim s 1

Who will open with Hayden in tests?
Who will be the next Pigeon(Mcgrath)?
Who will fill leg spinner vacancy?

Will Australia able to find the similar class?

2007-07-05 17:37:00 · 15 answers · asked by Thamara 3

Ok... When Sri Lanka, India, Pakistan perform bad ''outside'' the subcontinent, most of the commentators and cricket experts tend to say that Asian teams are not as good outside the subcontinent as when they're playing in the sub'conti or the home soil. But isn't this the same as that white teams play bad cricket outside their territory and play well in their home soils? Why can't they or don't they say/admit that? Ex - When England plays terrible cricket in Asia, they talk about this subcontinent conditions. But when an Asian team plays bad cricket in England it is because the white team is exceptional , according to them, not because the Asians are not used to cold weather or their conditions conditions,. But when Sri Lanka trashed England 5-0, they critisized the British teams' poor performace than praising the Sri Lankan team's performace. Isn't this funny?

2007-07-05 17:07:53 · 12 answers · asked by Teejay 5

Ok... When Sri Lanka, India, Pakistan perform bad ''outside'' the subcontinent, most of the commentators and cricket experts tend to say that Asian teams are not as good outside the subcontinent as when they're playing in the sub'conti or the home soil. But isn't this the same as that white teams play bad cricket outside their territory and play well in their home soils? Why can't they or don't they say/admit that? Ex - When England plays terrible cricket in Asia, they talk about this subcontinent conditions. But when an Asian team plays bad cricket in England it is because the white team is exceptional , according to them, not because the Asians are not used to cold weather or their conditions conditions,. But when Sri Lanka trashed England 5-0, they critisized the British teams' poor performace than praising the Sri Lankan team's performace. Isn't this funny?

2007-07-05 16:50:44 · 11 answers · asked by Teejay 5

oz-Booruwo.com

2007-07-05 14:32:20 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous