English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ok... When Sri Lanka, India, Pakistan perform bad ''outside'' the subcontinent, most of the commentators and cricket experts tend to say that Asian teams are not as good outside the subcontinent as when they're playing in the sub'conti or the home soil. But isn't this the same as that white teams play bad cricket outside their territory and play well in their home soils? Why can't they or don't they say/admit that? Ex - When England plays terrible cricket in Asia, they talk about this subcontinent conditions. But when an Asian team plays bad cricket in England it is because the white team is exceptional , according to them, not because the Asians are not used to cold weather or their conditions conditions,. But when Sri Lanka trashed England 5-0, they critisized the British teams' poor performace than praising the Sri Lankan team's performace. Isn't this funny?

2007-07-05 16:50:44 · 11 answers · asked by Teejay 5 in Sports Cricket

11 answers

british media kiwi media Oz media all are the same
BIRDS, OF, A, FETHER FLOCK TOGETHER.
When Vass single handedly defeated Kiwis first time in Kiwi soil the media said
"Even some kids of srilankan tea plukers could beat us now ."

How racial suc**s they are.
so what sub continent commentators do about it?
they are too gentleman type to point at fingers to Whites,instead do tit for tat.
Ex::Ranjit fernando, ramiz raja, ravi shastry

2007-07-05 17:01:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I respect to your ideas. I think they do not like to admire black skin nations. They need to dominate the cricket world. However, they cannot do that. Mainly I see this kind of ideas in the England and Australian. Nevertheless, Australia is very good cricketing nation. But England is very poor cricketing nation. They know they cannot adapt to the subcontinent conditions. Then they use to describe pitches as “very sluggish pitch”, “Slow pitch”. What did Sri Lankans in the England in their soil? They hammered England bowlers. I like the Sri Lankan approach to these things. I like if other Asians nation try to do the same. Especially England needs some hammering to stop these words. To do that, Asian players also should improve their skills to play well under swinging and bouncy conditions. They these white people would nothing to say.

I like if Monty Panesar, Sajid Mahammod, Bopara, Jeethan Patel, Owish Shah play for India, Pakistan or Bangladesh.

2007-07-05 18:58:14 · answer #2 · answered by Thamara 3 · 3 0

Good job bro.
White people introduced cricket to the sub continent countries and taught them how to play cricket.
But in recent past, subcontinent countries, specially SL taught them some lessons on how to play the real cricket. (best example is the 5-0 victory over England , if u watched the last match, u must be remembering how SL chase 300+ runs)
I think those people are not humble enough to tollorate their defeat and praise the talent of another team.

2007-07-05 19:08:25 · answer #3 · answered by Chama 2 · 2 0

"Neo-Imperialism"
the new method Whites have found to impose their"
BOSSY" attitude is this .
They have tendency to commit any shameless scheme,
in order to win .
when Sri Lanka humiliated England 5-0, they critisized the British teams' poor performace than praising the Sri Lankan team.That easily qualifies those commentator s as
Sheer ,Hypocrites

Once shamless Australian Prime -Minister Made a comment on Muralitharan as " Chucker"
that proved every ausie is qualified to be their ancestral inheritance. that is ex-convicts and making Crimes.
Australia decends from British ex-convicts,
if you dont know.
please ask anybody who knowslil bit of world history.
They were ship -dropped by British ships .
so both people are the same.
Making Crimes ,easy for them cuz, theyhave those GENES in their, BLOOD

,

2007-07-06 23:14:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Best question , after long time in this catigory.......~ ever heard of .... "Neo-Imperialism" The new method Whites have found to impose their" BOSSY" attitude is this .ex: Bush & America) They have tendency to commit any shameless scheme, in order to win . when Sri Lanka humiliated England 5-0, they critisized the British teams' poor performace than praising the Sri Lankan team.That easily qualifies those commentator s as ~~~~~~~~~"Sheer ,Hypocrites" ~~~~~~~~ Once shamless Australian Prime -Minister Howard,Made a comment on Muralitharan as " Chucker" that proved every ausie is qualified to be their ancestral inheritance. that is ex-convicts and making Crimes. Australia decends from British ex-convicts, if you dont know. please ask anybody who knows lil bit of world history. They were ship -dropped by British ships . so both people are the same. Making Crimes ,easy for them cuz, theyhave those GENES in their, BLOOD

2016-05-19 03:55:19 · answer #5 · answered by salome 3 · 0 0

england Australia & new Zealand most fans * media men are complete jealous people against Sri Lanka india Pakistan even to Bangladesh.

2007-07-08 02:59:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

sorry i will copy pramato







british media kiwi media Oz media all are the same
BIRDS, OF, A, FETHER FLOCK TOGETHER.
When Vass single handedly defeated Kiwis first time in Kiwi soil the media said
"Even some kids of srilankan tea plukers could beat us now ."

2007-07-06 07:59:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bcause they've no Idia to How to speak commentary

2007-07-10 11:48:08 · answer #8 · answered by NEiLES 1 · 2 0

I completely agree with you.Good work Joey, keep it up.

2007-07-05 17:32:55 · answer #9 · answered by Sarang 3 · 2 0

one of the reasons they play bad is because of the types of pitch they bowl on because like india their pitches are made specially made for spinners and the pitch is made made specially for all countries

2007-07-13 10:18:13 · answer #10 · answered by blade m 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers