Really I don't care about what Phil thinks because he's just another man like I am. I've seen both play and Michael Jordan is alot better in the records (stats, honors, & accomplishments). But this question is to address the Kobe jockers. These guys like to TWIST Phils word and INGNORE (like they do with stats & honors) what he really meant. Here is two quotes by Phil on MJ & Kobe:
1. "I don't understand why the Lakers treat Kobe as their most valuable asset....................He (Kobe) COULD HAVE BEEN the heir apparent to Michael Jordan and maybe won as many championships. He may still win a championship or two, but the boyish hero image has been replaced by that of callous gun fire."
2. "In a chat about Kobe, Jackson said he has displayed a better "overall" game then any other player he has coached. That would include, um, Jordan...................
He CLARIFIED the comments, saying he never asked Jordan to be a play maker."
Now what do you guys get from this?
2007-09-16
11:10:59
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous