Macro evolution (new functions and species) = random chance + natural selection.
If with unrealistically favorable assumptions, one finds that the random chance component is impossibly improbable, then macro evolution must be soley due to a natural force (natural selection is not a biological force, it must be caused first, then selected) that creates biological change.
In this case, it seems that a creator must exist.
For example, how did the brain get programmed for eyesight. To accept 2 images, combine them, to provide near instant assessment and response, millions of lines of unbelievably brilliant genetic code, how did that happen? We could put 1000 genius's to work on this for 10 years, and they would not be able to figure out how to do this. Not only is there no randomness, there is unimaginably brilliant creation involved. Millions of changes over billions of years cannot account for this.
I am skeptical about a solely natural, biological cause for life.
2006-10-06
09:40:53
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Cogito Sum
4