Other - Social Science - October 2006

2006-10-06 00:40:00 · 46 answers · asked by Ricky S 2

2006-10-06 00:32:01 · 9 answers · asked by thespianstarlet 1

2006-10-06 00:31:24 · 4 answers · asked by lakshmi s 1

2006-10-06 00:26:24 · 3 answers · asked by Ricky S 2

well i know people go raving and they do it in the most hidden away of places e.g forests and woods e.c.t. this is the habitat of most woodland creatures including the badger, so all i wanna know is if they really go mad 4 it like we youngsters do

2006-10-06 00:06:42 · 8 answers · asked by matt_lizard26 1

2006-10-05 23:36:47 · 12 answers · asked by Ricky S 2

2006-10-05 23:11:37 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-05 22:31:15 · 14 answers · asked by veeruhanda 1

A major roadblock in gays and lesbians getting the right to marry is the implication that they'll be granted full rights to raise children, but a great deal of people who are against gay marraige (who are wise enough to exclude religious implications, since no one cares about what God thinks anymore these days) are afraid that gays who raise children will raise them homosexual.

Has anyone yet thought of conducting an experiment where exceptionally young foster children are given into custody of gay, lesbian, and straight parents and their behavior and development is carefully monitored over the course of their lives? It's already upsetting to enough people that gays come out of straight homes, but don't we need to carefully study which household brings about which sexuality? If the results of the experiment follow no recognizable pattern, then it would be proven that sexuality of the children is NOT a result of the sexuality of the parents, and gays could be allowed to have kids.

2006-10-05 21:59:42 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-05 21:50:57 · 11 answers · asked by Ricky S 2

Who is the guy from somewhere bewten the 1400-1700s that old the future or something close to that. His name was Norte somthing and i believe his last name started with a D? Can u help me out

2006-10-05 21:40:55 · 6 answers · asked by aiken877 2

2006-10-05 21:07:45 · 8 answers · asked by Jane Doe 3

2006-10-05 21:06:39 · 12 answers · asked by yahooanswers 3

Give your opinion?

2006-10-05 21:05:18 · 12 answers · asked by yahooanswers 3

1.shakespear
2.william wordsworth
3.leonardo da vinci

2006-10-05 20:49:32 · 3 answers · asked by shantanu t 1

2006-10-05 20:47:02 · 6 answers · asked by shantanu t 1

2006-10-05 20:19:00 · 6 answers · asked by jude 1

2006-10-05 19:25:15 · 1 answers · asked by walang alam 1

2006-10-05 19:19:02 · 6 answers · asked by munmun g 1

2006-10-05 18:10:18 · 3 answers · asked by Deedeeyahoo 3

I want to know about when Edmund Ruffin was talking about his viewpoints.

2006-10-05 17:56:00 · 2 answers · asked by rey_mysterio_pimp 1

If it was not God's plan to devise as such, then who made a huge nation like that next to a very tiny one? Why should Tuvalu not try expand as big as China, and why should China not expand until no other countries exist to make complaint about injustice? Until now all world's affairs are solved based on Conventions, so should the UN hold a global conference to make the world an earth country (to avoid war of invasion) and to make all provinces as small as Tuvalu (to observe justice)?

2006-10-05 17:15:13 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

now first hand, I DO GO TO A CATHOLIC SCHOOL! It seems like just because they teach religion, everyone is an annoying prep. It's so goddam uptight. It makes no sense. Can someone clear up why?

2006-10-05 17:13:06 · 6 answers · asked by mariojoe7 2

Why do we continue to base on that wrong concept of the moving sun to make distinction between east and west? If I say I am residing in the west, how can you tell I am exactly on what part of the world?
It seems that, I am living in the west of the countries which started to see the fixed light of the sun over 23 hours before mine.
And it seems that we don't follow any truth, but we only follow conventions. But many people keep on telling that truth is based on what they see like the sun (which they can never touch!). Because conventions are not eternal truth (like national constitutions), so we have to rewrite them more and more often. And finally, we base on what truth to act as dictators (who claim to hold the truth!) or as supporters of a dictator (who claim to follow the truth!)? If there were no truth, how would we seek consensus to make new conventions? If we could not make new conventions to suit this global time, should intelligent beings accept to live under anarchy?

2006-10-05 16:47:28 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

They are there US Space Program Boys have known for years.
Steven Speilberg is an absolutly amazing person. Who's to say he isn't one or in disguise.

2006-10-05 16:02:41 · 3 answers · asked by aotea s 5

Google the word 'failure' and see what comes up as the first web page! Let me know what you think...

2006-10-05 15:53:32 · 5 answers · asked by soulgirl76 4

im whiting an essay

2006-10-05 15:16:34 · 1 answers · asked by jrock 1

im whritin an essay

2006-10-05 15:15:56 · 3 answers · asked by jrock 1

2006-10-05 15:08:54 · 2 answers · asked by mela p 1

2006-10-05 14:40:42 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous