I've been getting alot of replies to the effect that laissez faire works, in that "people" will determine their own destiny, in effect without an authority (democratic or not) guiding morality...I would like to challenge those who are in favor of laissez faire why economic freedom from authority is ok, but personal freedom from authority (lack of government) is not ok...for instance, if a corporation wants to pollute the water, according to laissez faire, the government shouldn't interfere (because the people will vote them out with their dollars rather than the authority figure) but if a regular person is polluting the water it is not ok (the person should be sent to jail by an authority figure)...How can a person justify businesses being free from authority yet people should not be free from an authority figure? It seems like the same rules for corporations should apply to regular people...and if that is true laissez faire would mean (lack of government) anarchy...wouldn't it?
2006-09-07
18:43:27
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous