Social Science - 8 October 2006

2006-10-08 01:58:55 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Economics

There are always vehicle accidents occur in front of my block. mine is the last unit of the street, before coming to an open land. Saw a rainbow was formed at that my block next I & mum withness a chain accidents. Wonder if there is any supernatural downthe roadside?

2006-10-08 01:57:41 · 4 answers · asked by strawberi 1 in Psychology

2006-10-08 01:55:32 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sociology

th fnding fathers, first thing after signing decl of ind, prohibtd entail & primogeniture, fixed clergy salaries [see letter jeff to adams, oct 28, 1813] to limit fortunes - they believed limitatn of fortunes is essential for capitalism, democracy, justice, survival, law, order, liberty - everything good - they were against wealth concentration - they warned that the corporation would get round their provisions to prevent wlth cncntrtn

they knew that money is power, & therefore huge fortunes are overpower, unjust, theft, monopolous, corruption, and tyrannous - they fled tyrannies, they wanted to establish liberty, they knew that superwealth = superpower = tyranny = warmongering, cannonfoddering of the people

overpower is power to steal & kill [war, conquer, plunder] with impunity, home & abroad - overpower is above the law & govt, buying, owning law & govt

monoply = pricegouging = theft [causes boom & bust, depressions]

ovrpay = undrpay = starvtn, war [kills 100mn/yr]

2006-10-08 01:52:48 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Economics

e.g. driving along one day past a shop called bang and olufsen I said "oh they are really expensive but i'd like to go there for a haircut one day". I later established that they actually make top of the range music systems lol

2006-10-08 01:51:51 · 21 answers · asked by Showaddywaddy 5 in Other - Social Science

Just because I can I want to give away ten points what makes you think you should have them (blatant rip off I know sorry carla)

2006-10-08 01:45:40 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Social Science

2006-10-08 01:45:15 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Social Science

2006-10-08 01:37:30 · 4 answers · asked by katy h 1 in Other - Social Science

2006-10-08 01:27:48 · 5 answers · asked by Guess Who 2 in Other - Social Science

2006-10-08 01:25:10 · 15 answers · asked by ? 4 in Anthropology

Any scientifical / sociological explanation?

Cultural habits?

2006-10-08 01:13:45 · 2 answers · asked by davegesprek 1 in Other - Social Science

Any scientifical / sociological explanation?

Cultural habits?

2006-10-08 01:13:27 · 5 answers · asked by davegesprek 1 in Sociology

2006-10-08 01:04:14 · 3 answers · asked by Apollo C 2 in Other - Social Science

everyone 'knows' that billionaires make money, but is it true?
all the money stands for all the work - no wrk, no products, money worthless - twice the wrk, same money, money buys twice as much wrk [products, wealth] - but in transaction [exchange, deals, trade], the workvalues of the items HAVE to be diffrnt, ie x and x+y, so transactn HAS to be fair exchange no robbery [x for x] plus 'robbery' [=y]

y can be large - eg, monoply prices - eg, new technolgy [demand high, spply small [indstry gearing up]] - eg, land, whch is monopolistic, called by economists a right of private taxation, eg, close the commons, herd workers into cities, cheap labour - eg, preventing import of grain in famine, big profits - eg, making big farms instead of small farms to reduce output [small farms 16 times more productive, eg, china & sudan, 30 times agri. efficiency of usa]

billionaires are the effect of big y's, ie robberies

they own 1000s times more prdcts [gds servcs] than they create - no?

2006-10-08 01:03:00 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Economics

2006-10-08 01:01:24 · 3 answers · asked by I_hate_being_single 3 in Sociology

And when they are, either they're psychos or slatterns...or have "victim" stamped all over their foreheads?

2006-10-08 00:39:22 · 5 answers · asked by *babydoll* 6 in Psychology

Just curious. I've noticed they're treated as good enough to flirt with or stare at (or other things) but not "good enough" in other ways....

2006-10-08 00:37:58 · 14 answers · asked by *babydoll* 6 in Psychology

More Importantly can we be their competition.? Money is being made and all you want to do is quiblle about ethics, morals, Life & limb? Get with the Program. Let's make MONEY!! Your are paying for it!! Why not PROFIT!!!

2006-10-08 00:31:12 · 5 answers · asked by LeBlanc 6 in Gender Studies

Any answer will be right.

2006-10-08 00:29:16 · 7 answers · asked by Marina 1 in Sociology

2006-10-08 00:28:51 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Psychology

I bet my friend it wasn't!

2006-10-08 00:26:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sociology

who's more irritating?

2006-10-08 00:25:03 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sociology

2006-10-08 00:24:27 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sociology

2006-10-08 00:23:36 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sociology

it seems false when put this way

what if the people want to outlaw murder?

so it seems the people have a right, indeed a duty, in their pursuit of happiness, to outlaw things they think are bad

but what if the people decide that unlimited fortunes are bad [as they should have done 1000s of years ago, imo, as unlimited fortunes kill 1000s of times more than murder does]

ppl argue that if the people want to outlaw unlimited fortunes, it is wrong, it is invasion of liberty

but what if the people decide [realise, as the founding fathers did, and as every wise person did] that unlimited fortunes are theft, tyranny, the death of democracy, justice, order, law, freedom, peace, happiness, the state [and now, thanks to e=mc2, all humans and all life]

what if the people realise that 'the state built on injustice cannot stand' [roman], that 'equality breeds no strife' [athenian], 'power corrupts' [or: the corrupt seek wealth-power more ardently], the powerful break the law?

2006-10-08 00:17:55 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Economics

After all we know it is profitable. We should get some of the benefits. Perhaps as a community or cooperative we can make ourselves some CA$H as well. Time is running out and prices of goods and services are rising. We would also be doing the nation a great service by paying the Nat'l War Debt. Let's really stimulate the economy and get the US rolling again. With the left over money we could inverst in a lobby or more!

This would be truly maxmizing on the entrepenurial spirit. We could get very rich. Now let's get those ideas out there. I talking business to you. Square,square, square, business.

You know when Mr. Opportunity knocks and you do not answer, you see his sister, Miss Fortune.

There must be something we can sell to make this happen.

We will call ourselves the Yahoo War Profiteers & Nat'l Debt Payers Group. A mouthful you say? I am open to better suggestions. My requriement is a mere 23 1/2% of the take!

2006-10-08 00:12:21 · 4 answers · asked by LeBlanc 6 in Gender Studies

After all we know it is profitable. We should get some of the benefits. Perhaps as a community or cooperative we can make ourselves some CA$H as well. Time is running out and prices of goods and services are rising. We would also be doing the nation a great service by paying the Nat'l War Debt. Let's really stimulate the economy and get the US rolling again. With the left over money we could inverst in a lobby or more!

This would be truly maxmizing on the entrepenurial spirit. We could get very rich. Now let's get those ideas out there. I talking business to you. Square,square, square, business.

You know when Mr. Opportunity knocks and you do not answer, you see his sister, Miss Fortune.

There must be something we can sell to make this happen.

We will call ourselves the Yahoo War Profiteers & Nat'l Debt Payers Group. A mouthful you say? I am open to better suggestions. My requriement is a mere 23 1/2% of the take!

2006-10-08 00:10:25 · 3 answers · asked by LeBlanc 6 in Economics

2006-10-08 00:09:46 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sociology