I am a student at a high school that uses the Integrated Mathematics Program. I really would like to see actual statistics that show IMP is a better way of learning math than traditional math lessons. I really do not feel that I have learned much and there is no possible way to study out of the textbook. I consider the textbook to be a book full of questions rather an actual learning tool because there are no lessons in the actual book. The only information given about how to solve the problem is given by the teacher and it usually is brief and what is I believe, not much use in real life, unless if I were to figure out the probability of events or finding out how to put a certain problem in summation notation. Most of the students I know do not like IMP and were so glad they had traditional math problems on our PSAT, rather than all word problems. Please show me official statistics that show IMP is a better way to learn IMP, and your own personal opinions.
2007-10-21
13:00:07
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Steve Y
2