Is IMP (Integrated Math Program) a more effective way to learn mathematics?

Question

I am a student at a high school that uses the Integrated Mathematics Program. I really would like to see actual statistics that show IMP is a better way of learning math than traditional math lessons. I really do not feel that I have learned much and there is no possible way to study out of the textbook. I consider the textbook to be a book full of questions rather an actual learning tool because there are no lessons in the actual book. The only information given about how to solve the problem is given by the teacher and it usually is brief and what is I believe, not much use in real life, unless if I were to figure out the probability of events or finding out how to put a certain problem in summation notation. Most of the students I know do not like IMP and were so glad they had traditional math problems on our PSAT, rather than all word problems. Please show me official statistics that show IMP is a better way to learn IMP, and your own personal opinions.

Answer 1

I don't think there are any statistics that show IMP to be any better than conventional maths teaching because it isn't.

For some low ability students who can't handle a traditional class IMP does allow them to actually learn some maths but for most students they're really no good (and often complained about because it doesn't teach the skills that are actually useful for sciences).

Answer 2

i think of the two between the previous posters spoke back with appropriate solutions. I merely had to throw in some anecdotes. I unquestionably have made an remark that there is at the instant a manner of colleges to label classes as computing device technology that, once you extremely evaluate the curriculum, are somewhat IT tiers with programing emphasis. i do no longer think of that computing device technology is greater elite yet fairly merely opt to show out that they do no longer seem to be the comparable ingredient. computing device technology is quickly the technology of computing. This includes a learn of the computing device shape, records structures, arithmetic, good judgment, concept, and purposes of computing. computing device programing is used in gaining wisdom of those matters yet once you have classes in development MySQL databases, or instructions in gaining wisdom of seen uncomplicated, they're merely merely no longer what i might call computing device technology classes. At a minimum, a working laptop or computing device technology curriculum could comprise here: - Math: Calc II + Linear Algebra and/or a especially designed Discrete arithmetic for CompSci direction - structures: a minimum of two out of assembler, computing device shape, and compiler layout - records structures: a minimum of an introductory direction - Survey of/Adv Programming Languages direction: understand the classic concepts and differences between crucial, clever, and so on language constructs good electives are: -stepped forward records structures -merchandise-oriented/concurrent programming From there many colleges furnish distinctive tracks which develop into pronounced before and so electives can selection slightly.

Answer 3

I was in high school and I don't find this math useful it was just a waste of time. Once you get out of school the math that you did in high school you don't even get credit for. What they should do is switch the math to having it separate instead of all together.