Charles Darwin told us in his 'Origin of Species' that species are highly subjective things. This runs contrary to the discoveries of Mendel and genetics. Does the evidence from science not show, instead, that a given species can exist in many morphological forms ? In such a case why is such a highly subjective argument as that used by Darwin used as 'evidence' of so-called speciation ? We could just as well interpret this evidence as the effects of reversing mutations, could we not ?
2006-08-30
10:16:25
·
16 answers
·
asked by
democracynow
2