Astronomy & Space - July 2006

Some 3600 years ago, several accounts described an object that was in orbit around our sun, called the "Destroyer" and some referred to it as the "Frightener." This object (also known as Ninirn or Planet X ) is expected to return. Just last year it was rumored to have been seen on its way to our sun. Any information is helpful. The above is all I know so far.

2006-07-14 07:37:19 · 4 answers · asked by ZORRO 3

I know this is going to sound really stupid but I'm just worried that the astronauts in outer space can see me from up there... is it possible??

2006-07-14 07:32:15 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-14 07:01:36 · 11 answers · asked by krishh1 1

- still expanding as it is, is the result of a collapsed black hole from another dimension fuelling a big bang (with no central point) into what is now our dimension/cosmos, and that in the far future our known universe will itself collapse back into a super condensed pin prick of reversed polarity matter where it can no longer be tolerated due to energy/mass/gravity and bursts through a dimensional warp of it's own making, creating in less than the blink of an eye a completely new Cosmos?

2006-07-14 06:33:55 · 23 answers · asked by treving 42 6

2006-07-14 06:10:43 · 8 answers · asked by kimzie 1

So as to be able to travel between galaxies, one would have to move faster than light which is impossible according to Einstein. Hence if were to develop inter stellar flight we should be violating Einstein. Is it possible?

2006-07-14 06:09:17 · 12 answers · asked by Metallica_freak 2

2006-07-14 05:33:59 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

We know what the speed of light is, but what is the speed of dark?

2006-07-14 05:32:43 · 11 answers · asked by wbroyhobbs 2

http://www.thatvideosite.com/view/843.html

2006-07-14 05:25:47 · 16 answers · asked by Innocuous pen... 4

my wee boy (7) wants a telescope, what would be the best kind to buy for him, and the best place to purchase it. i have a budget of £150. he will take it seriously. he's facinated with the night sky and stars, planets ect.

2006-07-14 05:22:10 · 11 answers · asked by daddio 3

Newton first law

2006-07-14 05:13:44 · 1 answers · asked by goring 6

2006-07-14 04:55:44 · 9 answers · asked by savvy s 2

2006-07-14 04:45:31 · 21 answers · asked by keith 2

I think we should.

2006-07-14 04:42:07 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-14 04:38:30 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-14 03:59:33 · 12 answers · asked by kingstonhip 1

time and date in us EST please

2006-07-14 03:58:58 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

If there are more worlds like ours in the universe? Did Jesus visit them all in the same way he visited ours? Did he die and rose again on all of them? If not, why are we so special?

2006-07-14 03:55:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you know what would or could happen?

2006-07-14 03:02:05 · 8 answers · asked by Lock Heart 1

2006-07-14 02:54:51 · 7 answers · asked by Eve W 3

How did the galaxy's begin? I like the big bang theory but what made the atom's that collided & exploded? How did they get there?

2006-07-14 02:23:52 · 28 answers · asked by Print Monkey 2

If creation is true, life (for the moment) is limited to as far as rocket fuel can carry us into space. Design solves a problem, and in nature it seems as if every single part has a tailor made purpose in solving a problem. Why then did the Creator add such a vast universe to the relatively small world that we influence? What is the purpose of the vastness of the universe? Are we supposed to populate it? Not so long ago western civilization was limited similarly in reaching new continents by technology. Is it there to keep us from contact with similar worlds? Why is there no divine mentioning of this? How would life on other planets influence our current world understanding & theories? Is it a question of if or when? Does life on other worlds have similar theories as ours? If they do, it will be undeniable proof in favour creation.

2006-07-14 02:20:01 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean, all the billions dumped into the space program, why not try to make it worth the time and $..

2006-07-14 02:19:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

what will happen if human dead body left in space ?

2006-07-14 01:55:06 · 10 answers · asked by rekamtekda 1

consider we had more than one sun , say 2 suns , but smaller in size and Heat generation equal to our existing sun.

If possibility that they were placed opposite each other , the earth would not get cooled. we could have more valcanoes. is'nt it ??????
Life would be difficult.
would oceans exist.
or would we have rains /evaporation cyle daily.

????????

2006-07-14 01:49:14 · 9 answers · asked by *****sada***** 1

2006-07-14 01:36:06 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does the description of space&time become irrelevant without the description of energy&matter and vice versa? If they can't exist independently from each other then I'm finding it hard to understand the definition of space&time not being the definition of what energy&matter is and does?

Is energy&matter the space&time it occupies? I understand that an area of space cannot have an ambient energy = 0 or the complete absence of all energy&matter due to its need for both a barrier and shape. So is space&time just a conceptually moving grid to understand and describe energy&matter?

What form does space&time take without the form of energy&matter.....I've just never heard of being able independently examine and dissect space&time away from the relevant energy&matter therefore causing this little essay.

These could be the dumbest questions in the world but i really hope for a couple of serious answers. Thanks.

P

2006-07-14 00:57:33 · 6 answers · asked by Pablo Fujita 1

The earth is massive and should acording 2 einstein curve the space around it so how come a magnet can pull a pin up from the earths surface. gravity surely should be the stronger force why is it so small?

2006-07-14 00:53:16 · 18 answers · asked by midnight hippo 1

I always wondered why there are 24 and not 20 hours in a day. Wouldn't it be easier for us all if there were 10 day-time hours and 10 night-time hours? So easy to show the time using our fingers, right?
And why 60 minutes in an hour? Why not 100 minutes?

2006-07-13 23:53:29 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Thank you for your prior answers.... I like the one about the Earth
moving... and that"s what makes the moon SEEM to move...

So, if the moon is actually not moving, but only a little per day, and, of course it is not spinning on its self... what keeps it hanging up there? not its movement...

And if it does not have an elevation of its own, are you implying that it is fix on the same orbit every month, and only changes in looks because of planet Earth movement only?

That would almost suggest that the moon is inert in the sence that
it would be a mere dead attachment ... kept soly up by a magnetic side (always the same side)...

And so... if the sun is the cause of the lit side, again I ask..WHY in the DAYLIGHT when the sun is high an the moon is a daylight moon, why isn"t this always a FULL moon than??

2006-07-13 22:59:30 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous