Politics - 5 December 2007

Why should we hear about body bags and deaths? Oh, I mean, it's not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?"

BY Barbara Bush

2007-12-05 01:37:47 · 21 answers · asked by RELAX 4

2007-12-05 01:35:43 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Thank you very much for your help!!!

2007-12-05 01:19:41 · 7 answers · asked by WOW-V 1

Why do we as Americans keep banging our heads into the wall of a 2 party system? What has either party achieved for America or done for you as an American? Isnt it way past time for Americans to be able to live as Americans again and not as slaves to a two party system that is keeping its boot on our necks?

2007-12-05 01:16:26 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was viewing questions on the immigration board and someone posted this as part of their answer:

"Be sure to get a European Health Insurance card. Its free and gives you unlimited access to any state hospital in the EU."

The US is so behind other countries.

2007-12-05 00:59:00 · 18 answers · asked by Zardoz 7

Now, Iran is saying they stopped in 2003. And we are ready to believe them...why???? Does North Korea ring any bells??? How eager the left is to ignore ALL the facts, just to point the finger.

2007-12-05 00:55:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Apparently David Abrahams will not be getting his money back as promised by Gordon Brown...is this another one of Gordon's gaffes? Doesn't he know the law?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7128375.stm

The businessman at the centre of the row over hidden donations to the Labour Party is unlikely to get any of his money back, the BBC has learned.

Sources at the Electoral Commission have indicated that the £663,975 given by David Abrahams via associates will instead go into government reserves.

Labour officials have been holding talks with the commission over how the money should be re-paid.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown has promised to return the donations.

2007-12-05 00:53:06 · 5 answers · asked by slıɐuǝoʇ 6

In the next century, nations as we know [them] will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all. – Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's deputy secretary of state, as quoted in Time, July 20, l992
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/1/9/163443.shtml

On July 18, 1993, globalist Henry Kissinger said in the Los Angeles Times, concerning NAFTA: "What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system ... a first step toward a new world order."

Whatever they call themselves, in 1994 this particular branch of our feckless ruling establishment moved heaven and earth to get around the U.S. Constitution. It did so when it climbed over the dying body that is the power of Congress to make treaties, including treaties on issues of money and trade.

Why did Clinton do this to America?

2007-12-05 00:29:04 · 22 answers · asked by Don't Know 5

2007-12-05 00:27:23 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-05 00:24:11 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

since Bush was well aware of that why in God's name he deliberately keeps misleading American people and people all over the world that Iran is working on nuclear weapons and that somehow Iran wants to attack US?

2007-12-05 00:21:07 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-05 00:00:28 · 14 answers · asked by Put on your boxing gloves boys! 4