Now, Iran is saying they stopped in 2003. And we are ready to believe them...why???? Does North Korea ring any bells??? How eager the left is to ignore ALL the facts, just to point the finger.
2007-12-05 00:55:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Exactly, the Iranians can never be trusted or, held at their word and the art of Intelligence has failed us time and time again.
I say we based our foreign policy upon Ahmadinejad's own words - those which he utters against the US at every chance - and his actions - his fueling the battle in Iraq since our arrival, etc, etc....
Anyone who believes that if given the chance, Iran would not use a nuclear bomb against ourselves or, the Israelis are not paying attention.
2007-12-05 01:04:46 · answer #1 · answered by wider scope 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Like they are still enriching uranium for "peaceful" purposes ???? If you believe that, then you and I need to get a poker game going...bring all your money !
Those raghead mullahs have NEVER allowed unfettered access to their nuke facilities, and never will.
You want to risk YOUR kids on Iran being truthful, go head.
But I'll be damned if I'm gonna let liberals risk MINE on fuzzy thinking about the "niceness" on the Iranians !
2007-12-05 02:08:52 · answer #2 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Iran has built nuclear reactors that is used to produce enriched uranium - the popular fabric for a nuclear bomb. Iran has additionally built countless different centers designed to refine and added strengthen standard uranium into weapons-grade uranium. they have again and again bragged approximately how they have geared up those centers deep underground - the place no longer even different worldwide places' nuclear weapons ought to wreck them. Why could a u . s . that's in contact in non violent use of nuclear potential ought to construct such issues at large fee? Now, on an identical time as weapons-grade uranium can be used for producing electrical energy, it variety of feels somewhat strange that Iran could have intentionally chosen this path for their nuclear application whilst there are lots of of alternative options available immediately - options that use extra fee-effective supplies, extra fee-effective reactors, and are lots extra secure than older, uranium-based reactors. meanwhile, Iran has been actively coming up and finding out missiles - missiles that must have the capacity to wearing a nuclear warhead to Israel and added. finally, if Iran's nuclear application became into truly only for non violent applications, why has Iran refused to allow UN inspectors into particular centers? in accordance to the treaties Iran has signed, they are meant to allow UN nuclear inspectors unfettered get admission to to all centers to confirm that Iran isn't using its nuclear application to construct weapons. in this factor on my own, Iran is already in violation of its treaties. So that's no longer (only) the U. S. or Israel that thinks that Iran is actively coming up nuclear weapons. that's most of the worldwide places who're part of the UN, as evidenced by using their participation in sanctions against Iran.
2016-10-10 07:34:28 · answer #3 · answered by wilabay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No thats not what they are saying silly, the US is saying they stopped in 2003 this is a US Intelligence report ! Get it straight my man.
2007-12-05 01:02:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Iran didn't say it stopped developing nuclear weapons of mass destruction in 2003: a U.S. intelligence report found that to be the case, in direct opposition to what the Bush administration had been claiming.
A paranoid administration, intent on declaring 'war' on any other sovereign nation that might endanger our own 'national interests' (interpret that as "what's OUR oil doing underneath THEIR sand?"), has proven that it will stoop to any level of deceit to achieve its mission of enriching America's "big oil" profits. What else should we expect when two oilmen are in the top White House slots??
When our own intelligence reports contradicts our President and Vice-President, I would think any rational citizen would have to assume there's a fox in the hen house. -RKO- 12/05/07
2007-12-05 01:03:42 · answer #5 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
If they never intended to develop nukes and stopped in 2003, what do they need heavy water for? The only application is weapons technology.
2007-12-05 01:01:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
It's still saying it never was trying to develop nukes.
And we still have no evidence they ever were. Just an NIE that is saying they stopped for some reason.
2007-12-05 01:26:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
US INTELLIGENCE is saying this!!! AND BUSH was informed of this in 2003
2007-12-05 00:59:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes. And Hitler said he killed no Jews.
2007-12-05 01:15:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
read the newspapers and you will see us intelligence said
this is true.
2007-12-05 01:01:38 · answer #10 · answered by Jerry S 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋