English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In the next century, nations as we know [them] will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all. – Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's deputy secretary of state, as quoted in Time, July 20, l992
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/1/9/163443.shtml

On July 18, 1993, globalist Henry Kissinger said in the Los Angeles Times, concerning NAFTA: "What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system ... a first step toward a new world order."

Whatever they call themselves, in 1994 this particular branch of our feckless ruling establishment moved heaven and earth to get around the U.S. Constitution. It did so when it climbed over the dying body that is the power of Congress to make treaties, including treaties on issues of money and trade.

Why did Clinton do this to America?

2007-12-05 00:29:04 · 22 answers · asked by Don't Know 5 in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

One word "money" its all about the money!!! We are being systematically destroyed from with in and now from without! Its going to take a "revolution" by the American people to stop them too. And its not just the republicans or the democrats doing this to our country its both of "THEM". Its time WE the American people wake up and starting taking "THEM" down!Dont you think it time for a new third party? A party made up by Americans for America? What have the DEms or the Reps done for you or for your country in the last 30yrs? Well?

2007-12-05 00:53:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

What you say is certainly true. NAFTA was signed by Clinton and the country has been on a downward spiral ever since. Actually the decline began under Reagan. Just look at a chart of the National Debt. Did you ever notice that Henry Kissinger is behind almost everything bad that has happened in the twentieth century? Bush consulted him about Iraq. He's the real Dr. Strangelove.

2007-12-05 00:42:13 · answer #2 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 3 2

The future is coming like it or not. The world in that future cannot survive as it has for centuries, and something else will take it's place. In 1 or 2 hundred years people will be saying the same thing about what ever replaces what is coming now. Kick back, enjoy the ride. Adapt of die, thats the future.

2007-12-05 01:01:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You are witnessing to slow and gradual decline of the United States as a world superpower...it didn't start with Clinton, it started with Truman....The bomb both established the United States' superpower in the world, and was the beginning of the end of it in the eyes the rest of the world....we Americans are wonderful at not practicing what we preach, destroying those whose disagree, and still hanging on to and trying to shove down the throats the 'principles' of a book that has long been proven to be nothing but a compilation of metaphoric ancient stories and legends that weren't even original in nature, copied from similar stories written centuries before it was ever thought of. Politicians are doing their darndest to see to it that it's 'Revelationary' predictions 'come true' but what most of don't even realize is that is just another 'scare tactic' to keep us all in line, and our future generations will look back and laugh at a civilization that worshipped an invisible deity and killed and died in the name of it, just like our own ancestors....Clinton's role was miniscule at best compared to what George Bush has done and is still trying to do in these last days of his Presidency, which is provoke another needless war with Iran. Short of trying to take over the world herself, Hillary Clinton would be but a short break from the carnage that will surely ensue lest we elect a President with no religious affiliation.....highly unlikely until at least the Social Security runs out, and Americans really see what lies it has all been, and freer thinking Americans are voting.

2007-12-05 00:52:35 · answer #4 · answered by squishy 7 · 1 2

the rustic is fractured with the aid of Bush, Clinton , Bush Clinton domination of the White domicile. we want a replace. those 2 households have finished this united states of america better harm than sturdy. .

2016-10-25 11:55:08 · answer #5 · answered by farrior 4 · 0 0

Thank Og President Bush came in, withdrew from NAFTA and those other treaties, and restored full respect for the Constitution.

2007-12-05 01:15:35 · answer #6 · answered by Brian A 7 · 1 1

Way back in 1400s people were wailing gloom and doom as the city-states and petty princdoms of various regions united to become NATIONS. The evil of Nationalism was blamed for loss of cultural identity, loss of local autonomy, loss of local currencies, and so on. Ireland, Scotland, and England are still bickering about it 600 years later.

Back when Imperial Rome was expanding it's borders, the peoples of many Roman occupied nations worshipped their "foreign conquerors" as gods. Rome had brought them prosperity (the Romans built roads and protected them making extensive foreign trade possible) and health (public sanitation, excellent water systems).

I think it's inevitable that the smaller units of human communities ammalgamate into larger ones as means of travel and communication allow. Clans unite to become tribes, tribes unite to become federations and petty kingdoms, which in turn unite to become modern nations. Federations of nations are part of this natural progression. You can't move into the future if you're afraid to let go of the past.

2007-12-05 00:56:09 · answer #7 · answered by kill_yr_television 7 · 1 1

Why limit blame to Bill Clinton? There has been a plan in place for over 60 years (thanks in large part to the Bush family's patriarch, Prescott Bush) to establish a one-world government. In June, 2005, George W. Bush met with the President of Mexico and the Prime Minister of Canada in Waco, Texas to further discuss the creation of the North American Union. Bush met with them again earlier this year, and - again - without the knowledge of the American people or the consent of Congress. The North American Union would establish one currency: the Amero, for all three nations. The North American Union would be one of seven such "unions" across the globe (including the European Union, the Asian Union, the African Union, etc.) in a first step toward one global government. I doubt that Clinton's role in this destruction of America was at all as significant as the Bush family's role has been.

2007-12-05 00:40:36 · answer #8 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 4 4

Answer: Why did Clinton over ride the DOD and sell missile guidance tech ( that advanced them 25 years) that puts the west coast within Chinas reach today???
They say traitors like Clinton can be bought for twelve pieces of...shiny but not valuable.

2007-12-05 01:47:10 · answer #9 · answered by trumain 5 · 3 1

It kinda makes you wonder why he was voted into office twice, even though people knew he was deceitful and was distracted in the oral office with an intern even while on the phone making executive decisions.

And people may still vote for his lying wife who has done nothing anywhere in this life without Bills pull.

I guess we are a nation of sheep.

.

2007-12-05 01:12:00 · answer #10 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers