Politics - 14 November 2007

Wikipedia encyclopedia articles are written by anyone who joins up -- even if they have ZERO expertise or knowledge in the topics. There is no expert or subject matter review that anything on Wikipedia is accurate. So WHY does anyone believe Wikipedia and why does YAHOO and GOOGLE promote their site with a high ranking in searches?

2007-11-14 02:52:10 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-14 02:42:43 · 18 answers · asked by Duminos 2

Looks like Iran is proceeding with its nuclear weapons program and will have a functional nuclear device in a couple of years.
Should we:
1) hope they show restraint?
2) take a proactive approach in denying them the ability to make a nuclear device?
3) mind our own business and let the rest of the world's nations decide what to do?
4) none of the above and offer your ideas?

2007-11-14 02:23:20 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

It was entitled "judgement day" and focused on the Intelligent Design-Evolution court case stemming from Dover, PAn school board.

An excellent window into the desire by some religious fundamentalists to control science and force dogma onto the citizens... A "must see", and a prime example why there needs to be clear separation of church and state...

Any thoughts to share?

2007-11-14 02:15:16 · 10 answers · asked by outcrop 5

This is not front line news because it is contrary to the mainstream media agenda.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071114/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpoliticsiaea_071114120832

2007-11-14 01:57:40 · 15 answers · asked by rance42 5

If we dont, will water be bought and sold on the market in the future? How about a tax on the air we breath?

2007-11-14 01:57:31 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-14 01:50:42 · 6 answers · asked by Q Q Baloch 2

There are more people on earth than there are resources, organization and transportation to keep people alive. 10 million children will die from lack of medical care this year. 100 million need to be adopted, and will not be adopted. The pro life movement could save these people simply by redirecting their massive resources to these proven needs. Yet they choose to focus on saving a fetus. It is a fact that each time they use resources to save an unwanted fetus, they cause the death of a wanted fetus or child. There is no net gain in lives saved. In fact it is proven that each "saved" fetus causes the death of 12 loved and wanted children.
For that reason I am repossessing the name "pro life" and reissuing a more appropriate name "anti life". Those who are now "pro life" should refrain from using that term and now use the name I have issued you. :-) It would also be nice if "prolifers" would quit taking donations under false pretenses. http://www.prolifeismurder.com

2007-11-14 01:48:09 · 23 answers · asked by Give me Liberty 5

its for a history project so helpful answers plz

2007-11-14 01:46:56 · 5 answers · asked by screamxx16xx 1

Fighting these wars in Iraq and Afghanistand.
Not taking care of business what the people voted them in for.
Neglect of Americans and our infrastructor.
Can the American people put them all on trial at once?

2007-11-14 01:32:11 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-14 01:19:42 · 12 answers · asked by amazed we've survived this l 4

are bad, but trade and good relations with communist China and Vietnam are good, even essential?

2007-11-14 01:15:46 · 11 answers · asked by amazed we've survived this l 4

Tis the season to be toxic!

2007-11-14 01:10:01 · 28 answers · asked by The President 3

Is 9.118 trillion dollars just too much to imagine?

http://brillig.com/debt_clock/

2007-11-14 01:03:22 · 18 answers · asked by Zardoz 7

Is it maybe that he can't read statistics, hasn't any data, and appeals to the crass and ignorant. Oh, I forgot, all math and statictics and professional studies have a liberal bias...you guys are so blind it is ludicrous

2007-11-14 01:02:39 · 23 answers · asked by alphabetsoup2 5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsLHxja43iY

2007-11-14 00:58:11 · 10 answers · asked by Naturescent 4

Seems GWB's vision is paying off"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071114/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

2007-11-14 00:51:36 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.air.org/news/default.aspx#8thGrader

2007-11-14 00:25:50 · 22 answers · asked by alphabetsoup2 5

For me it was Clinton and I'm glad I did.

2007-11-14 00:20:18 · 19 answers · asked by Love United 6

when we are spending more on non lethal technologies than any other country in the world?

2007-11-14 00:17:05 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-14 00:12:28 · 10 answers · asked by ExpectingGod'sBest 1

When asked to both republicans & democrats would they take a VP slot if they were not elected to represent their party they all said no. That makes me question whether they really want to help this country or do they just want the notariety of being President. I think it's the latter. I feel that once again we are voting for the lesser of two evils. What do you think?

PLEASE NO BASHING CANDIDATES OR RACES OR SEX AS I WILL REPORT YOU!!!!

2007-11-14 00:09:36 · 11 answers · asked by Love United 6