Politics - 11 October 2006

2006-10-11 05:17:50 · 9 answers · asked by carolinadawg01 1

2006-10-11 05:15:21 · 1 answers · asked by MEL T 7

Rather than have a legitimate debate about whether we should continue to allow people to break our laws, they pull out the race card. It seems cowardly and weak.

2006-10-11 05:14:22 · 11 answers · asked by songndance1999 4

Why do you think they are not basing their entire campaign on a strong national defense?

You would think if they want to be elected that they would be in the news constantly on the key issue of the election, but instead all they can talk about is phone sex.

This behavior does not make me feel comfortable that they can lead in these dangerous times. How about you?

2006-10-11 05:13:56 · 11 answers · asked by rmagedon 6

.....and all in between: Do you think that it is because of our dis-like for one another that we allow ourselves to become blind and do things out of hate instead of for the well being of everybody?

What i mean is, many people vote for the person in their party even though they do not think that person is the best qualified. They think that just because that person is in that party, that person thinks the way they do.
Don't you think Republicans do things just to tick off Democrats and vice-versa?

2006-10-11 05:11:57 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-11 05:09:44 · 11 answers · asked by Gettin_by 3

It's true. The liberal wackos are at it again!

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=oddlyEnoughNews&storyid=2006-10-11T115308Z_01_N10380564_RTRUKOC_0_US-LIFE-COCKROACHES.xml&src=rss&rpc=22

2006-10-11 05:04:30 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-11 05:02:40 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-11 04:55:44 · 19 answers · asked by brutebishop 2

It will, after all, Be China's fault for assisting a brutal dictator proliferate nuclear weapons.
China has the means and the capability and this is their neighbor. Sanctions won't do squat unless China stops supplying them.

2006-10-11 04:48:40 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

What Foley did is wrong. No defense from me. Now whether he actually had sex with a page boy or just communicated with them is still under investigation.

Yet Pelosi marches in parades with NAMBLA(North American Man Boy Love Association) advocates and that's ok. My guess is that if Pelosi would have the guts to go to San Francisco and condemn NAMBLA she might not be so popular with the boys there.

Once again why such a double standard?
My best guess is that Pelosi and other dems really have no problem with what Foley did or what NAMBLA does, they just have a problem with who Foley is....a Republican.

What a farce. We should lock up every pedophile for life and every pedophile that murders should face the death penalty. That would go a long way of fixing the problems with pedophilia in this country.

2006-10-11 04:45:28 · 4 answers · asked by songndance1999 4

About 655,000 Iraqi civilians dead since the invasion.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/10/11/iraq.deaths/index.html

And Bush making statements like this:
“Who could have possibly envisioned an erection – an election in Iraq at this point in History” --- George W. Bush, Washington D.C, January 10, 2005.

2006-10-11 04:44:50 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

He even wears platform heels to try to be taller, and apparently thinks nothing of starving millions of his people to death so that he can build nuclear weapons.

2006-10-11 04:44:39 · 4 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4

2006-10-11 04:42:10 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Defiance and purported nuclear development have been coming out of that nation for 3-5 years. Or did the President prioritize correctly, in your opinion?

2006-10-11 04:36:23 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-11 04:35:12 · 21 answers · asked by MEL T 7

Does anyone think that N.Korea may launch a nuclear warhead on a missile against the US?
Does anyone think that Japan doesn't have the ability to take out any incoming missile that threatens it?
Is S.Korea without defences against attack? OK they may be at very short notice.
Finally is Geaorge Dubya overstating the whole thing?

2006-10-11 04:27:55 · 17 answers · asked by roy d 3

Why do liberals cry "free speech" and then try to supress free speech so much. For instance, the episode at Columbia University where mob of students(a socialist club on campus) rushed the stage and prevented the Minutemen spokesperson(invited guest) from sharing their views. When asked about it the protestors said that they were justified because the minutemen's position was not legitimate.(I guess freedom of speech has to be approved through them)

Assuming that the Columbia students had a right to do what they did, then why was a protestor at Barbara Streisand's concert met with expletives when he essentially did the same thing as these students. He heckled her as she did a skit mocking George Bush.

A third example is the lawsuit against two talk radio hosts in Seatlle for sharing their views on a peice of Washington state legislation that would increase gas taxes. The liberal government has gone after them and is trying to make it illegal to speak their minds.

2006-10-11 04:17:34 · 7 answers · asked by songndance1999 4

2006-10-11 04:12:29 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

the biggest benefit will go to the highest income bracket: their tax rate will be cut from 38.6 percent to 35 percent, a drop of 3.6 percent. The middle income tax brackets will be cut only 2 percent (from 27, 30 and 35 percent to 25, 28 and 33 percent). The lowest income tax brackets, 10 and 15 percent, will not be reduced at all.


So those rich people only pay 35% of their income

while the middle class pays 25-33 %

and the lower class has to pay a whopping 10-15%


Geeez how dare they only make the rich pay 3 times higher percentage of tax than the poor!!!!!

2006-10-11 04:08:04 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.chuckhawks.com/liberals_hate_guns.htm

http://www.mnf-iraq.com/

http://www.keepandbeararms.com/newsarchives/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=301

2006-10-11 04:07:56 · 12 answers · asked by buffman316 2

Is that money well spent?

2006-10-11 04:03:30 · 5 answers · asked by lethallolita 3

So many people responded to the last question with "Iraq has no WMD and NK does"

Well, Hindsight is 20/20, we know NOW that Iraq does not have WMD, we did not know then. Saddam CLAIMED he had them and BTW Nuclear is not the only type of WMD, chemical weapons work just as well, and he was trying to make them and said he had them.

North Korea SAYS that they are testing a nuclear weapon and sets off an explosion the size of a champagne bottle top cork coming off and now we should invade them? No one has PROOF that NK has any WMD, and the leader CLAIMS he has them, what is the difference between the situations?

Once again with my question about the double standard? Why is it ok for people to bash bush for invading Iraq and also for the same politicians to bash him for NOT invading North Korea?

2006-10-11 04:01:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-11 03:58:29 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

seem to have a hypocritical point of view. They support certain things, specially Acts and Bills presented by the President or the Government that violate the 4th Amendment and The Constitution such as Warrantless searches/arrests/wiretaps. Yet when Gun Control is mentioned, they mention the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment and critisize that the Constitution and 2nd Amendment should not be violated by anyone or anything?

2006-10-11 03:47:39 · 22 answers · asked by Enterrador 4

Plus they do not debate they insult and are unwilling to agree to disagree. Also it is fine to say a 1st offense DUi is the same as 1st degree murder. Why are they so devoid of feelings for people that do not share their views? Why is it good to cheer the death of our troops and honor Kerry for be a NK hero and French hero but of course he wasn't an American hero odd how things work out? Also why is it no big deal about Kennedy and that women drowning in his car while he was drunk, 2 felony's at least? Why do they claim to be smart when they do not know the diffention of is is? Why are all their positions logical fallicy's or hate speech?

I was just wondering I know I will likely get no real answers on this just yet more examples of what I wrote aboe.

Lastly why do they hate religion and pray for the stock market to down when they are out office, what is wrong with these peope?

2006-10-11 03:45:53 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Arming teachers with guns to protect students against gunman attacks! AHAHAHA!! Mrs. Hewitte now can teach "art" and the "art" of shooting!!!

Also teaching students to rush and attack a gunman if they are confronted. AHAHAHAH!!! my kid is gonna get shot because he listen to the advise of the teacher and not the gunman!!! AHAHAHAHAAHHA!!!

how has times change...these 2 ideas are so RIDICULOUS that i just have to go AHAHAHHAHA!!! HOW BOUT GUN CONTROL PEOPLE!!???

2006-10-11 03:44:03 · 19 answers · asked by Dr.True 2

2006-10-11 03:43:03 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-11 03:38:35 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Things are over packaged. We could use reusabe bags? so we should start reducing packaging of items and start using recyclable canvas bags. Do yahoo users agree. (refuse plastic, no thanks I do not need the waster of your bag?) I hate seeing them on the side of the road and in alley ways. We could always go a step futher, the technology for electric cars is out, A company named ZAP sells anice economical XEBRA and other cars. Why do we keep doing this to our planet, our beloved country. Why the states continue making stupid regulations, they need to regulate plastic bags and regulate the use of gas powered vehicles.

2006-10-11 03:33:27 · 15 answers · asked by southernboy 4