English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 27 September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

THAT HAS TO BE A MAJOR EMBARRASSMENT.

2006-09-27 13:40:19 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Because instead of protecting us, as the BUSHCO tries to tell us, we now have the best recruitment agent for terrorism since 9/11.

We are all prisoners in this country, because we dare not travel the world freely, our communications are monitored, we can be dragged off the streets as terrorists, and the deficit is now so high it can't be controlled.

Mind you we can still arrange a few more wars with your tax dollars.

2006-09-27 13:36:18 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was talking with my libertarian friend today (he has correct opinions on economic matters unlike socialist liberals). We were talking about how public roads are a burden on people and cost too much money. Our solution is this: Privatize every road in America.

What do you think?

2006-09-27 13:34:59 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

That a coke snorting, alcoholic with no morals would make such a bad leader of the free world? His corrupt and criminal administration would lead the country deep into a mired pit like Iraq is? How many people here are really glad they voted for him? How many are glad that he was appointed? I personally will be glad when his term is over and he is safely back in Texas where he can not do as much harm to the country.

2006-09-27 13:34:38 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

to protect the Clinton lies

2006-09-27 13:32:20 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or was it an accidental cigar stabbing

2006-09-27 13:31:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why does bush refuse to protect America? the ports for one.

2006-09-27 13:30:23 · 14 answers · asked by ast5792 1

why are the innocent people being killed in IRAQ everyday in dozens?

2006-09-27 13:29:13 · 4 answers · asked by sherrry 1

Jerry Falwell is a prominent Southern Baptist Jesus freak, in addition to the whitest man who ever lived. He is famous for making ignorant and offensive pronouncements which are often followed by retractions and halfhearted apologies.

A shining example of this was the statement he made two days after the 9-11 terror attacks, while the wreckage at Ground Zero was still smoking.

I just can't fathom any human being actually listening to this guy's bullshite.
Can you explain why you would like him?

2006-09-27 13:26:01 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you don't help me clean up the hoods in your area would you look at me with suspicion and hatred?

Bush, and the Presidents of Pakistan and Afghanistan

Creating more terrorists by the day in Pakistan..... right?

2006-09-27 13:25:35 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-27 13:18:27 · 9 answers · asked by woodpyleonwildy 1

1. Why are religious leaders such as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson allowed to make political suggestions to their congregations and allowed to keep their TAX EXEMPT status?
2. Are they in the pocket of the President or is their no longer a separation of church and state in this country, or both?

2006-09-27 13:14:13 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've heard it repeatedly and just wanted to know what you thought about it............

2006-09-27 13:14:03 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think that would be a good thing?

2006-09-27 13:12:47 · 14 answers · asked by Duffman 4

IS THAT WHY THEY ARE TRYING TO TRIGGER A NEW ONE ASAP WITH GLOBAL WARMING?

SO MUCH FOR THE SPORT ILLUSTRATED SMIMSUIT ISSUES. :(

2006-09-27 13:11:32 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

ARE THEY THAT SURE SHE'S GOING TO BE THE ONE THAT THE NEOCONS WILL LOSE TO IN 2008?

2006-09-27 13:07:33 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is Jon Stewart the funniest man on the planet and is he single handedly saving our Democracy?

Hint: the answer is yes.

2006-09-27 13:05:27 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

My fellow Republicans...

The RNC is working on a new housing plan for the poor and elderly in this great nation. No more section 8 vouchers, no more gov't subsidizing!

Instead the RNC envisions entire communities created and planned just for the poor and elderly!

The RNC will help provide sheet metal, tin, 1/4" plywood, and have the residents build their own homes! They communities will be built along clean rivers and streams to provide water! Ample trees in the forest will provide a energy source for heating and cooking. Each home will cost $300, instead of the 2.6 billion we spend to help house people annually.

We will name these communities after Herbert Hoover, that lead America through times of great prosperity!

MY fellow Republicans.......Will you support the new RNC plan for housing?

2006-09-27 13:04:11 · 9 answers · asked by Villain 6

2006-09-27 13:03:37 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

A good first lady or just another chance to play with cigars in the White House

2006-09-27 13:03:26 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

she wants to be president or is she tired of the "cigar" treatment

2006-09-27 13:00:55 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Living or you could go back in time and talk to one that has passed. What you you say.

I would choose Ronald Regan. I would tell him that he was a good man. It was a wonderful thing that he helped get the Berlin Wall torn down.

He had a consistent level of leadership and was open to all people

2006-09-27 12:59:12 · 16 answers · asked by Jean R 3

UNDER FALSE PRETENSES?

THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE TALKING ABOUT HIS GLOBAL INITIATIVES THAT HE HAD RAISED 8 BILLION DOLLARS FOR. INSTEAD THE FAUX NEWS REPORTER TRIED TO USE IT AS A SLAM SESSION, AND BILL ATE HIS LUNCH FOR HIM.

2006-09-27 12:52:12 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-27 12:52:08 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-27 12:51:04 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

who wears the tin hat ?
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060708185023266
http://www.public-action.com/911/firemen.html
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd213.htm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/LYN406A.html
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8666444901186351024&q=9%2F11+cover+up%3F&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9213554821937648649&q=9%2F11+cover+up%3F&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490&q=9%2F11+cover+up%3F&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5198414016757468145&q=9%2F11+cover+up%3F&hl=en


http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/stop_ignoring_9_11___pnac.html
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/manufactured.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4467791
http://www.wanttoknow.info/9-11cover-up
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?ChannelID=75
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2003/06/18/911/index.html
http://www.whatreall

2006-09-27 12:49:55 · 10 answers · asked by hardartsystems 3

HE MUST WANT ONLY RICH PEOPLE IN POWER THAT CAN AFFORD TO RUN FOR OFFICE FOR TERMS OF YEARS.

WOULDN'T IT BE GREAT TO SEE REGULAR EVERYDAY PEOPLE AGAIN RUNNING AND WINNING OFFICE IN AMERICA? TRUMAN, CLINTON, ETC.

2006-09-27 12:45:06 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers