English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

HE MUST WANT ONLY RICH PEOPLE IN POWER THAT CAN AFFORD TO RUN FOR OFFICE FOR TERMS OF YEARS.

WOULDN'T IT BE GREAT TO SEE REGULAR EVERYDAY PEOPLE AGAIN RUNNING AND WINNING OFFICE IN AMERICA? TRUMAN, CLINTON, ETC.

2006-09-27 12:45:06 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

CHARLOOCH; HE'S SAID IT NUMEROUS TIMES.

2006-09-27 12:48:59 · update #1

10 answers

I would prefer a military coup to the Bush administration. Marshal Law 100% draft, with no excuses.
________________________________________

But a return to the first Congressional pay system would be fine with me. $5.00 a day if they show up and work all day.

Go big Red Go

2006-09-27 12:58:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You say regular, everyday Americans and you throw Clinton into the mix? When did he ever have a job in the private sector? When did Ted Kennedy ever have a job in the private sector? When did Al Gore ( as he once was elected) ever have a job in the private sector? George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Tom Delay, just to name a few, all have worked in the private sector. The problem is with career politicians. I agree that the salary for politicians, especially on the federal level, should be cut or reduced immediately to force these people to work for a living, rather than live it up on your and mine tax dollars. Well, at least mine because with your intellect, it doesn't seem like you probably pay too much income tax.
As far as "rich people" that can afford running for office, unless you are a moron, you obviously know many lib-socialist dems are millionaires.

2006-09-27 19:53:28 · answer #2 · answered by TexMan98 2 · 3 1

Ho, ho, ho!
Clinton--- an everyday people??????????
Clinton NEVER worked a single day in his life!
He lived off taxpayers from the time he left home.
He's always been a user, never a giver.
He's uses and abuses. And betrays anyone who trusts him.
(Only foreigners use the term NeoCons.)
Do you support terrorism against us?
If You were using satire, and I missed it. Or, more likely, you live in a Muslim country and hate America.

2006-09-27 19:57:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

if they want to rule it should be voluntary, and with good intention to make some good changes that will make America better. We cant have libs, the ones who only care about the power and the money they recieve, be in power, they will tax us to death to pay for thier vacations.

2006-09-27 19:51:06 · answer #4 · answered by ace 6 · 2 1

I have never seen him post that comment...do you have a link of proof?

_ well i see he said it here. I don't normally agree with him (as he can attest to that) but I must agree with that being a positive possibility for politics and the people they represent in general.

2006-09-27 19:47:48 · answer #5 · answered by Charlooch 5 · 0 2

LMAO sorry to hear that clinton was some poor inbred redneck Just like you like them Right Oyomama

2006-09-27 19:51:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Because he understands that they are any way going to make 100 times more than the salary.Salaries are an eye wash.

2006-09-27 19:52:20 · answer #7 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 1 2

your right i would love to see regular people in office, maybe thats the way, threaten the ones in office now by taking away their precious money

2006-09-27 19:46:54 · answer #8 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 3 2

we monkey libs like you You are a scared little monkey and make fun of people that you think are strong, good people. We monkey libs will fling poo in your honor o great one

2006-09-27 19:47:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

poop

2006-09-27 19:52:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers